Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Um...shouldn't it be a piece of cake to get Hastert removed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:40 PM
Original message
Um...shouldn't it be a piece of cake to get Hastert removed?
He knew about Foley's antics for a year now and left him in his position with no punishment at all? Never said a word about it publicly? As Americablog put it: Why did Hastert leave Foley in charge of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children when he knew Foley had some possible personal issues involving the exploitation of children?

Shouldn't this be a slam dunk case to get Hastert to resign as Speaker at least?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. You assume he has some shame
The Republican House leadership has none
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One thing that average Republicans at least claim to stand for is
children. Shouldn't we expect leagues of Republicans to demand for Hastert's resignation as well as soon as this particular part of the Foley case gains traction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. On would hope especially since they have been protecting
Foley for a while now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whatever happened to the ethics investigation into that sale of land
he owned that was near an area that was being marked out for an interstate highway? Didn't he decide where the highway was supposed to go or something?

He's a fat slug. That's common knowledge. Corrupt as hell. So are all repubs. And I'm sure that he could rattle of shitloads of scandals that he is either involved in or knows about.

He won't be going anywhere unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. ain`t going to happen-if we are lucky the dems
will take the house and the illinois 14th can become just another district
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. And he doesn't know the words to the National Anthem, except
"bombs bursting in air." Fat repig!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. He'll have to step down as Speaker in January
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. We need to ask the Republicans if they think he should resign
I want to give every Republican a chance to defend Hastert. Let us see if they support people who solicit sex from minors chairing on the Caucus for Missing and Exploited Children. Ask them if they think that Hastert was right to not do anything. Ask them if they think Hassert should resign. I want to hear where the party stands not just on Foley, but on everyone that knew about him and did nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwar Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I recently had a tumor removed
It was easier than passing a Hastert.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Becuase Hastert has more than
"once ett a bebby, get in mah belly". and folly was just and errand boy, sent on a mission...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes.! Throw Denny Hastert OUT
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 10:53 PM by trashcanistanista
Big Break for John Laesch! It couldn't happen to a nicer guy (John, that is.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. youtube vid: Had enough of Hastert? lets throw Denny Hastert OUT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. well he looks like he could easily retire for "Health reasons" so that
could be his out. Hastert looks like a walking heart attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. The House has decided to throw Foley under the bus.
From Roll Call, via Josh Marshall:

“Congressman Foley told the Clerk and me that he was simply acting as a mentor to this former House Page and that nothing inappropriate had occurred. Nevertheless, we ordered Congressman Foley to cease all contact with this former House Page to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. We also advised him to be especially mindful of his conduct with respect to current and former House Pages, and he assured us he would do so. I received no subsequent complaints about his behavior nor was I ever made aware of any additional emails.

“It has become clear to me today, based on information I only now have learned, that Congressman Foley was not honest about his conduct.

“As Chairman of the House Page Board, I am working with the Clerk to fully review this incident and determine what actions need to be taken.

“The House Page Program has been an integral part of the House of Representatives for many decades. Preserving the integrity of the House Page Program is of utmost importance to me and to the House of Representatives, and we intend to uphold and protect its values and traditions.”

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2006_09_24.php#010056

---

They are insulating the House leadership as we speak.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe transfer this bishop off to the new free Kirkuk diosese? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's bombard "Dateline" with this question
They could use it for their next "To Catch a Predator" hour. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. And John Walsh as well
I'm curious on his take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Bloode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think so.
This is worse than Trent Lott's little slip that got him removed. A porrly thought out off hand remark did him in. Hastert is complicit, or appears to be in letting this go on. This will not go down well with the fundies, not at all. Unless they can keep it quiet of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think so too
This is pedophilia, harboring a felon? Definitely usable and good timing for the re-election he is up for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. SHOULD be a slam dunk
but these are REPUBLICANS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sad thing is
They will just replace him with another perverted sick fuck.
They are ALL cut from the same cloth and all have the same fat, greasy, bald look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. Um, shouldn't it have been a piece of cake to get Delay out?
Hell, he's still running in Texas I hear.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC