The freeper people are in meltdown mode over this Foley thing

[Herman Munster]

I think that the way this is going to break wide open (because the Democrats are already demanding an investigation into how long they knew and what they did) we probably will lose the House.
And they KNEW it. They knew this could happen and they screwed the whole country by letting it slide and protecting their own.

All the while they ask for our support, they ask for our money and they ask for our votes. I'm more disgusted than I can even express.

-------

Yay, more fodder for the "all Republicans are closet gay pedophiles" mill! I can already see the libtard blogs ejaculating over this.

--------

:rofl:

[BrotherBuzz]

1. They are saying the Dems have infiltrated their ranks!

What's the name of that river in Egypt? :rofl:

........

To: Lunatic Fringe


Apparently he is an infiltration into the Republican Party. No true Republican, would act that way. We have a lot of them who have infiltrated our party.


43 posted on 09/29/2006 12:12:01 PM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)


< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies >

[dipsydoodle]

5. Haha - the famous Moses joke.

De Nile. :)

[CarbonDate]

7. Ah, "No true Scotsman..."

A freeper favorite.

[BrotherBuzz]

13. Aye. Let's help them put sugar on their mush fallacy.

:rofl:

[LostInAnomie]

2. I don't think they are "closet" gay pedophiles.

I just don't think anyone has asked them yet.

[Lexingtonian]

3. it's poetic justice

that the Pubbie House leadership goes down because of gay sex.

[pk_du]

4. Just reported on ABC news in my region that Hastert ( R-Corrupt)

has known for almost a year......stay tuned - this one aint over by a long shot.

[americanstranger]

9. Not only that...

But it was brought up to the House Page Board, which is run by two Republicans and a Democrat.

They never told the Democrat.

Josh Marshall is all over this - and he's already caught Boehner in an apparent lie.

- as

[Pryderi]

21. Foley: Co Chair, Missing and Exploited Childrens Caucus

http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=CNIP8121

[symbolman]

32. Hey Stranger

you got that link to US being on the Scarborough Show with this Boy Licker? Send it to me so we can make a thread about it :)

Our Lobbyist pal told us about that guy THREE YEARS AGO, I was biting my tongue the whole time we were on that show!!

We've been looking for the footage all day,

Hope all is well too for ya and beloved :)

[Pryderi]

20. ahahaa...take a look at Hastert's page!

http://www.house.gov/hastert/

[Occulus]

25. Initially, I thought 'Emerald Ash Borer' said

'Emerald Ash BONER'

Which would describe a medical conditon even Dr. Frist couldn't cure :D

[Subdivisions]

30. I clicked on his Contact link and sent a little message:

Mr. Hastert:

The revelations concerning Mr. Foley and the subsequent news that you, along with a few of your Republican buddies, have known about this activity for a year and yet did nothing, has prompted me to action.

On your homepage is this: Keeping Kids Safe in Cyberspace. In fact, nearly your entire website seems to concentrate on the issue of keeping kids safe on the internet and your efforts in this regard.

Tell me, Mr. Hastert, is witholding information about the activities of Mr. Foley, thereby enabling him to continue molesting children for and entire year, the way you keep children safe in cyberspace?

The American people don't like child molesters nor those who enable them, Mr. Hastert. I've taken the liberty of saving your site and have taken several screen captures to pass along to the Blogosphere as I begin a personal campaign to Keeping Americans and Children Safe from a Corrupt Congress.


Sincerely

XXXXXXXXXX

[Pryderi]

39. Excellent! It would make a great letter to the editor!!!

[Occulus]

24. HOW many did he tell?

Did he insinuate? In what words?

Can we say, MAJOR PEDOPHELIA INVESTIGATION on the cusp of a PIVOTAL NATIONAL ELECTION?

I thought we could. :D

[kenny blankenship]

6. If you "can already see the libtard blogs ejaculating over this."

then you're TOO CLOSE!

[Shakespeare]

29. heh.....who's the 'tard now, huh?

HUH?!

What a bunch of idiots. Here, I'll speak slowly and use small words: These people (elected republicans) you've hitched your wagon to are corrupt, perverted, Constitution-destroying, America-hating scumbags.

Got that? Good. Sorry it had to come to this for you to figure that out. Now be good little freepers, and go vote democratic.

[ToeBot]

42. Now what type of person, do you suppose, would choose wording such...

as that to articulate this particular issue? Hey Sigmund, any comments?

[kskiska]

8. This Ldotter is totally in denial

Reply 3 - Posted by: Henry Clay, 9/29/2006 7:34:28 PM

I read the e-mails. I refuse to believe that is him. Republicans don't do this kind of thing -- they are constitutionally incapable -- it's not in our make-up. I think we ought to see who funded this kid -- Chavez? Soros? Hillary?
I'm very suspicious.

http://lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=298839


Hannity & Colmes had nothing on their show Friday about Foley. One Freeper said he'd been defending Foley on his radio show.

[Dem2theMax]

12. "constitutionally incapable?"

WTF? LMAO! Boy, that one is FULL of kool-aid. :rofl:

[w13rd0]

16. Constitutionally incapable...

...of propositioning underage boys for illicit sex, but NOT constitutionally bound to prohibit torture or spying or election theft...right. No Dorthy, the Republicans seem quite capable of ALL of the above, regardless what the constitution says.

[Occulus]

26. Not in "your makeup" to sexually molest children?

Riiiiight. M'kay then. There are a number of D'Nial Bishops (Cartman voice) 'ovah neeyuh' who would hotly contest your remark, Mr. Lucianne dot com poster.

Are these people human? Do they speak English? Do they fully understand that language?

Good bloody strungup CHRISt!!!! I cannot believe I share genes with such human detritus....

[susu369]

40. Chavez? Soros? Hillary? - that's the ticket

Can't stop laughing!

[CarbonDate]

10. Are any of them condemning the act as abhorent....

...or are they just worried about how it's going to affect the November elections?

[ryanus]

11. Good. It's about time

[Jack Rabbit]

14. If it makes the Freeps feel any better

No, I don't think all Republicans are closet gay pedophiles. I'd be willing to bet that being a pedophile has nothing to do with one's political ideology.

What should bother them is that we can say all Republican House Speakers knew about a deputy majority whip who was a pedophile and did very little about it.

And that's bad news for the GOP.

[Syncronaut Seven]

19. As so often seems to be the case

The republican party seems to draw bullies with stunted emotions and strange ideas about white male entitlement. It's no coincidence that pedophiles and republicans share many of the same controlling personality traits.


Dems tend to be more empathic me thinks. Pugs just wish to dominate, frozen as territorial 4 year olds who dont know how to articulate their needs without fists.

[Raine]

33. The repuke party is just

a good place for so many of them to hideout cause of it's stress on 'moral issues'.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

15. "can already see the libtard blogs ejaculating over this." Yes we are...

n/t

[tinfoilinfor2005]

41. Female libtard here...

I don't think WE are the ones doing the "ejaculating"...I've seen the transcript.

Nasty man. Nasty, nasty, nasty. Need-to-disinfect-my-computer-screen-after-reading type of nasty.

[Gold Metal Flake]

17. Closet gay Republican freep envisions liberals ejaculating.

So sad.

[stevietheman]

22. On the other hand, maybe Republicans wouldn't be so uptight...

if they gave ejaculating a try. Heh.

[Gold Metal Flake]

44. They ejaculate. It's where that is the problem.

Pedophiles or pedophile enablers, I make no distinction. They all must be removed from power.

The Re-NAMBLA-cons.

[Singular73]

18. There is disgust in freeperville tonight.

Not at the age of the boy. But the gender.

[tenshi816]

35. Yes, and I think that our reaction

is just the opposite: it's not the fact that Foley is gay, because that should be a non-issue. It's the fact that he was writing sexually suggestive e-mails to a minor.

Trust the freepers to look at this through the wrong end of the telescope. They don't care that Foley was coming on a a kid, they only care that it was a child of the same sex.

[Catherine Vincent]

23. I'm loving it!

[Pryderi]

27. Wasn't there a "Call Boy" scandal under Reagan and Bush I? I'd love to

see Bush II asked about it!

[kerry-is-my-prez]

28. Man - all hell is breaking loose!

n/t

[Trajan]

31. I hate to get overly optimistic ....

because disappointment is always ready to overwhelm you if you hope 'too much' ....

But DAMN .... Did the GOP just have their "Blue Dress" moment ? ....

[Justice Is Comin]

34. No you freep pterodactyls, this is Cunningham #2 and counting.

[radfringe]

36. when do they blame it on Clinton for

setting a bad example...?

[malaise]

37. I saw a thread where Freepers blamed the Democrats

since the Dems held this information until close to the election. Turns out that Alexander and Hassert had tis information for almost a year. Damn this is funny.

[Frank Cannon]

38. "The Congressional Republican Pedophile Scandal"

Casually drop that phrase into conversation at least three times a day.

:rofl:

[Dawgs]

43. "ejaculating over this"

Can't these people get sex off their mind? Jeebus!!