Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about ballots / voting re: Foley

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:42 AM
Original message
Question about ballots / voting re: Foley
I read yesterday that since the Nov. ballots have already been printed, the Repugs will name a new 'nominee' and that ALL votes for Foley will automatically be counted toward the new 'nominee'. How can that happen? I always believed that if you vote for someone that is who receives the votes. If they want someone else, shouldn't that person be a write-in candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The republicans are in charge and if they don't like the laws...
...especially election laws, they just change them. I'll bet money there'll be emergency amendments and delays authorized for this bump in the road. Don't forget, they need to do some polling before they even choose a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Great! If Jeb calls a special session for this, Crist will lose the
Governor's race. Won't happen in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. they would have to have an emergency meeting of the legislature..
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 08:53 AM by liberaliraqvet26
politically I dont think they could do it. Every state sen & rep would have to go to tallahassee. It would keep the Foley thing in the news and probably will be more damaging to them.

Also the Florida Supreme Court is reliably liberal and will overturn any challenge.

I think their backs are to the wall on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think you are correct
Looking at it in a different way you made me realize that having Foley disappear as soon as possible will be their best option. Look for another distraction by mid week to take America's short and predictable attention span and focus it on something else. Maybe a new Bin Laden video or audio tape? An elevated security level based on "credible intelligence" from the same people who brought us the yellow cake uranium from Niger fairy tale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Plus if you look at how it could affect Crist...
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 09:17 AM by liberaliraqvet26
Crist (R-gov cand.) will likely already suffer in Foley's district, just because of party affiliation. The state party will be hammered in the media if they play games with this. There is already precedent from '04 and they know the Florida Supreme Court will not go to bat for them.

ALSO, Crist (like Foley) has always been dogged by rumors of his sexual orientration. Some ultra- conservatives are already upset about this. You can be sure that the Foley thing will make them watch every move he makes into the election. If you read right wing blogs you see that in their sick and dimented minds they honestly believe that there is a correlation between sexual orientation and child predators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure about Florida law, but didn't NJ have the same problem when
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 08:53 AM by Poppyseedman
they replaced the Torricelli with Laudenburg?

Precedent might have been set.

State law says that when a vacancy occurs in a race, the "appropriate state, district or county political party" designates a new candidate.

When the vacancy occurs after the primary election, as is the case with Foley's resignation, "the ballots shall not be changed and the former party nominee's name will appear on the ballot. Any ballots cast for the former party nominee will be counted for the person designated by the political party to replace the former party nominee."

Democrats faced a similar situation when Jim Stork, the party's challenger to Republican U.S. Rep. Clay Shaw, dropped out of the House race for health reasons in September 2004. His name stayed on the ballot while Democrats picked political consultant Robin Rorapaugh to replace him. Rorapaugh got 35.3 percent of the vote.


http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/nation/epaper/2006/09/30/a29a_negron_0930.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Didn't a woman candidate get murdered in Nevada after the
ballots were out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. So, that means primary votes are worth - Nothing ?
And does it mean that at any time a political party can ask for the resignation of a candidate and then count all the votes the duly elected primary winner receives as being cast for a new candidate? What if this happens at the 11th hour of a campaign? If I vote for a 'name' on a ballot, I expect that vote to be counted toward that name, not a 'stand-in'.

Just doesn't seem constitutional to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's too fucking late for them to choose a candidate. We TAKE THE SEAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's Florida law
But the Republicans are likely to sue and try to get a new name on the ballot. Supposedly, not all the ballots have been printed so this will end up in court. I would not be surprised to have a Bush appointed judge stop the printing presses, and then rule that a new name can go on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. the Florida Supreme Court will not do that.
they have a clear liberal tilt and have ruled on this already in '04. they have the final say.

5 DEM appointees vs 2 JEBbies

They have been striking down Jeb's crap since he took his throne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. That makes me happy...I didn't know it was still Dem leaning
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. its the only thing we got left down here...
they keep striking down his voucher scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. New ballots with a new name works for me but...
I have always believed your vote counts toward the exact name you voted for. If new ballots are not printed, then I have a problem with the voting process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. CNN reported that votes for Foley would be counted as votes for the new
candidate. So people will have to pull the lever for a pedophile republican. That should set well with the right wing Christian politicos. Let's see how much stomach they have for that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. The Fundies Will Have To Vote For Foley
As other posters have noted...it's posted at Election Central at TPM...the balots have been finalized (absentees have already gone out), thus Foley's name stays on the balot. The Repugnicans can name someone who will be the Repugnican candidate...and I suspect that's a done deal by now...but voters will not see that person's name on the November balot, they'll see Foley's. In order for the GOOP to hold this "safe seat", voters will have to vote for Foley as a proxy for the new candidate. That means the fundies and freepers will have to pull the lever for a gay pedophile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. But they (the Repug machine) will be out in force...
telling them "You're not really voting for him... It's just a name and we have a 'new' guy but you have to actually vote for the 'old' guy in order for the 'new' guy to win?"

I believe all votes cast for the 'old' guy should count toward the 'old' guy and a 'new' guy should be a write-in candidate. Makes sense to me, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Don't Be So Sure About That...Look At Their Choices
My bets are the Repugnican vote in that district will be supressed now. Who to vote for? Kathrine "boobsalot" Harris? This stuff has so much slime as to keep all but the most rabid party hacks...the ones who would applaud booosh eating a live baby on prime time TV...to go to the polls.

No need to mess around with a write in...having Foley's name in people's faces is like having an advertisement in every voting booth that says "Vote Repugnican...Vote Pedophilia".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC