Revolt of the Generals (via Truthout)

[yojon]

Wonder how far these guys are prepared to go to protect their troops from annihilation in Iran?



Revolt of the Generals
By Richard J. Whalen
The Nation

Thursday 28 September 2006

A revolt is brewing among our retired Army and Marine generals. This rebellion - quiet and nonconfrontational, but remarkable nonetheless - comes not because their beloved forces are bearing the brunt of ground combat in Iraq but because the retirees see the US adventure in Mesopotamia as another Vietnam-like, strategically failed war, and they blame the errant, arrogant civilian leadership at the Pentagon. The dissenters include two generals who led combat troops in Iraq: Maj. Gen. Charles Swannack Jr., who commanded the 82nd Airborne Division, and Maj. Gen. John Batiste, who led the First Infantry Division (the "Big Red One"). These men recently sacrificed their careers by retiring and joining the public protest.

In late September Batiste, along with two other retired senior officers, spoke out about these failures at a Washington Democratic policy hearing, with Batiste saying Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was "not a competent wartime leader" who made "dismal strategic decisions" that "resulted in the unnecessary deaths of American servicemen and women, our allies and the good people of Iraq." Rumsfeld, he said, "dismissed honest dissent" and "did not tell the American people the truth for fear of losing support for the war."

This kind of protest among senior military retirees during wartime is unprecedented in American history - and it is also deeply worrisome. The retired officers opposing the war and demanding Rumsfeld's ouster represent a new political force, and therefore a potentially powerful factor in the future of our democracy. The former generals' growing lobby could acquire a unique veto power in the future by publicly opposing reckless civilian warmaking in advance.

No one should be surprised by the antiwar dissent emerging among those who have commanded our legions on the fringes of the US military empire. After more than sixty-five years of increasingly centralized and secret presidential warmaking, we have concentrated ultimate civilian authority in fewer and fewer hands. Some of these leaders have been proved by events to be incompetent.

I speak regularly to retired generals, former intelligence officers and former Pentagon officials and aides, all of whom remain close to their active-duty friends and protégés. These well-informed seniors tell me that whatever the original US objective was in Iraq, our understrength forces and flawed strategy have failed, and that we cannot repair this failure by remaining there indefinitely. Fundamental changes are needed, and senior officers are prepared to make them. According to my sources, some active-duty officers are working behind the scenes to end the war and are preparing for the inevitable US withdrawal. "The only question is whether a war serves the national interest," declares a retired three-star general. "Iraq does not."

More at Truthout.
--------------------------------------
EDIT: COPYRIGHT. PLEASE POST ONLY 4 OR 5
PARAGRAPHS FROM THE COPYRIGHTED NEWS
SOURCE PER DU RULES.

[sce56]

1. This should be the number one topic in the MSM news!

http://web.archive.org/web/20030602211200/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2855921

The theory is they use this to blackmail important people like legislators and other prominet leaders to go thier way in voting controling the military etc etc.
It is the repugPEDOPHILElican way

Got Fascism Yet?

[jimshoes]

2. Kick

[teach1st]

3. Kick

[Pachamama]

4. Not just protecting the troops from annihilation in Iran...wanting to

protect all of us citizens too....

They know, the Generals who are speaking out, they know that this administration is leading the troops and this Nation down a suicide path....

:scared:

[Vincardog]

5. I beg to differ The mis administration is not leading us down any path

They are force marching us down the path to destruction.

[Imagevision]

6. August 2005, the CIA; "civil war in Iraq could happen in the summer of 06"

[many a good man]

7. Wow! Its time to "resume the debate"

America is a uniquely favored nation that redefines itself in each generation. But we have had a lifetime of embracing one democratic global war, and numerous presidentially inspired, politicized and secret smaller wars that have turned out badly. Sixty-five years after Pearl Harbor, we owe it to the past three generations to resume the debate on our national identity, suspended on December 7, 1941, and foreshortened on September 11, 2001.

Long overdue, imho.