|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Stevendsmith
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:41 PM Original message |
Foley, Woodward, Abramoff will be non-issues by this time next week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. drip drip drip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Business as usual, as you said. And we thought Reagan had Teflon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. I don't know about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenman3610
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Clinton sounded the"charge"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Foley won't fall off the map if this hits... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Can't count on the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Baloney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. You tell him girlfriend! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Why - thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. Oh, but now we have Jon and Steven and Keith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NEDem
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Don't know about that. Woodword will be in 60 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. if Woodwards still active they might sacrifice another pedophile to distract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
11. CORRECT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
12. Maybe so. But the bad news is enough to erase the momentum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. I'll take that bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevendsmith
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Okay. I hope I lose! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Sounds good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevendsmith
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. No problem! I'll put up the thread and we'll both monitor. Cheers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not Foley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
16. these are clear cut felonies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
18. But these events are still losing Repubs votes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think Abramoff is just now becoming the story in Sacramento. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
21. We have more surprises |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. You hear the Hammer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Sat Sep-30-06 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
25. Not the Foley issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC