Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Hastert's Ofc Releases Official Statement Re: FOLEY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:32 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Hastert's Ofc Releases Official Statement Re: FOLEY
Breaking: Hastert's office releases statement on Speaker's office's "internal review" ...

INTERNAL REVIEW OF CONTACTS WITH THE OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER REGARDING THE CONGRESSMAN MARK FOLEY MATTER

On Friday, September 29, the Speaker directed his Chief of Staff and Outside Counsel to conduct an internal review to determine the facts and circumstances surrounding contact with the Office of the Speaker regarding the Congressman Mark Foley matter. The following is their preliminary report.

Email Exchange Between Congressman Foley and a Constituent of Congressman Alexander

In the fall of 2005 Tim Kennedy, a staff assistant in the Speaker's Office, received a telephone call from Congressman Rodney Alexander's Chief of Staff who indicated that he had an email exchange between Congressman Foley and a former House page. He did not reveal the specific text of the email but expressed that he and Congressman Alexander were concerned about it.

Tim Kennedy immediately discussed the matter with his supervisor, Mike Stokke, Speaker Hastert's Deputy Chief of Staff. Stokke directed Kennedy to ask Ted Van Der Meid, the Speaker's in house Counsel, who the proper person was for Congressman Alexander to report a problem related to a former page. Ted Van Der Meid told Kennedy it was the Clerk of the House who should be notified as the responsible House Officer for the page program. Later that day Stokke met with Congressman Alexander's Chief of Staff. Once again the specific content of the email was not discussed. Stokke called the Clerk and asked him to come to the Speaker's Office so that he could put him together with Congressman Alexander's Chief of Staff. The Clerk and Congressman Alexander's Chief of Staff then went to the Clerk's Office to discuss the matter.

more at:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010070.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. To get to the heart of the press release....
Hastert was told but doesn't remember being told. All the rest is blah, blah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Two words: COVER UP....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Officiallese
For one hot potato.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh how deep will this smell go lies uptop of lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Spineless Cover UP in the most WIMPY ASS WAY....what the hell
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 07:04 PM by opihimoimoi
kind of non statement was that all about...

reminds me of the ZERO THEORY...the consences thingy....they all do it, ....

No One is To Blame....Its all OK....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe the story from Hastert's office at all.
I can understandthe parents wanting to protect their son's privacy, but I don't buy the story of no one saw the text of the emails. If they hadn't, they would never have talked to Foley! That's just not the way it works!!!!! People don't investigate something without knowing atLEAST the principle details!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dobson threw Mark overboard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC