Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woodward is the Rosetta Stone.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:56 PM
Original message
Woodward is the Rosetta Stone.
He's the key that unlocked the door.

Woodward signaled that the Ruling Class is throwing Baby Bush under the bus. Hence, the Foley "scandal."

We now know that the Repubs knew about Foley a long time ago. The Repubs live in sin-city, so a little man-on-boy innuendo could be easily covered up. Clearly the "media" has been complicit in this and EVERYTHING that shills for Repubs and attacks the Democrats.

Now, Woodward has signaled the media that the Ruling Class has changed their minds.

You think this time-line is a coinkydink? Only Military Intelligence knows fer sure.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. To quote my wife when I read her your post--
"Makes sense to me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Good to know
that I make sense to someone. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Republicans still control the House and Senate after the next election,
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 10:01 PM by Eric J in MN
...what will you conclude?

That the Ruling Class still supports Bush after all, or that the Ruling Class wasn't powerful enough to put a check on him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The Ruling Class is not a monolith.
Plus, the Ruling Class has recruited the Reconstructionist Religious Right as their 'base.' The Ruling Class don't give a shit about those people; just as they don't give a shit about us.

There are many strange powers at play here. However, I stand by my statement that Woodward has issued an important message to the "media" and the Ruling Class.

Only time will tell, but I think there is clearly a jumped-the-shark moment involved here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't Woodward former Naval Intel? Guess they see * as a losing
proposition-in for a rocky road ahead-cuz he just don't like to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is a noticable change of tone from Woody..
Just a couple years ago he was sniffing Bush and getting a brown nose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. The ruling class damned well better give up on him
This rubber stamp Congress and Senate just gave Bush totalitarian powers. That means he now has the power to go after the ruling class if he deems them enemy combatants. If they are eliminated then Bush/Cheney win all the marbles. That is not going to happen.

I agree with you. The ruling class has decided the line has been crossed and they are going to swat down those who have gotten too full of themselves.

And in case Agent Mike is prowling -- I have no inside information to support me theory. It is pure speculation on the part of this humble plebeian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I trust WOODWARD as much as I trust ShrubCo.
Why would Shrub and CHEENEE (or anybody) even TALK to him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Because he has been a reliable resource?
Gee, the WaPo certainly cheer-led the Iraq war and has been in the Bush camp until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. bu$h had no trouble talking to him when bu$h was being interviewed
by Woodward for the book, "bu$h at War".

Of course, at that time, Woodward was going through his "Chris Matthews phase".

By the way, here's an excerpt from "bu$h at War"

"'We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of our great nation." -- G.W.bu$h
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gilbert and Sullivan put it best with regard to "reformed" villains
Part from Song cut from the Second Act of Ruddigore...



Well, the man who has spent the first half of his tether,
On all the bad deeds you can bracket together,
Then goes and repents - in his cap it's a feather -
Society pets him as much as it can.
It's a comfort to think, if I now go a cropper,
I sha'n't, on the whole, have done more that's improper
Than he who was once an abandoned tip-topper,
But now is a highly respectable man!

Woodward may have begun to redeem himself, but it's one step. He's got much for which he must answer.

"Seeing the light" isn't enough at this point for someone who had the influence he had

His fellating of the regime over the last few years was reprehensible.

Folks-- forgiveness is divine, yes. Forgetting-- nope.

Remember and hold folks accountable for their actions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Um, I don't think this is about "redemption" or "forgiveness."
I think this is Business As Usual.

That's my point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree--but I wasn't responding to your statments but rather the
"Rosetta"-ing of Woodward (i.e. positive nature to his being)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Um, "Rosetta stone" is not about "positive nature" - it's a metaphor for
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 10:56 PM by scarletwoman
a tool of interpretation.

And Woodward IS a tool.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Uh...it's also a metaphor for a Key and/or a catalyst for change
A tipping point if you will-- which is already been used when describing his work.

The MSM has already referred to Woodward's work in such a vein--

As if the rest of us needed to wait until we were told by Woodward of the failures.

I agree that some view it as a Key in a different light, but my post was to bring up the point that Woodward must be held accountable for his actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. But that's not how the OP was using it. And I think you're thinking of
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 11:17 PM by scarletwoman
"Touch Stone", which fits your definitely far more accurately than "Rosetta Stone".

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Here's the sticking point
He's the key that unlocked the door.


Some will use that in a positive light.

The keystone that unleashes the dam...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's the Iran war plans -- making lots of factions nervous, I bet.
I'm sure the Saudis are not too keen on seeing a Persian shitstorm stirred up in their neighborhood. And there have been lots of hints lately that at least some folks in the U.S. military aren't too thrilled with the idea either.

Wall Street, Big Oil, and the multinational corporations probably aren't too big on setting up a possible confrontation with China over a war that might seriously interrupt China's energy supply.

Only Military Intelligence knows fer sure.


True, dat...

sw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Persia?
Where's that? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Heh. But I'd like to know what you think.
If the "ruling class" IS turning on bush -- or at least some factions within it, what do YOU think their motive is?

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I wish I was smart enough to answer.
I have no idea about anyone's varied motives.

However, once again, I think that piece-o-shit Woodward's "book" and the media's coverage of Repub "scandals" does fit a time-line.

China is ALWAYS in the background. They practically own this country.

Motive? (channeling Rummy) "Who Knows?"

There are MANY possible answers. We live behind a veil.

I don't know squat. I only try to see what's available.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. There was a point at which the powers-that-be decided Nixon had to go
I think.

I suppose the same thing could happen with Bush. He's been acting increasingly psycho. One wonders if he's talking to the portraits in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. When the time came, Goldwater led the party leaders to the kill

but, God help us, there was no Cheney waiting in line and Gerald Ford came in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. That's why Agnew went bye-bye
BEFORE Nixon did!!!!

How did THAT happen?

Answer: The "Media."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SquireJons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. I have to say, that's what I was thinking n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. well, something is happening......with Olbermann on the loose
and Tweety spending a whole week on Macaca, something is beginning to rumble. I just hope it's not another aborted beacon of hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC