|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:25 PM Original message |
Let's stop trying to defend Foley, or give him ANY benefit of doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Can you name one dem/progressive who has given Foley anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. DU'ers insisting he's not a pedophile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. me too. It really puts me off. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. And that has *what* to do with "giving him the benefit of the doubt"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Well if he isn't a pedophile then he didn't really do anything 'wrong'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. No, I haven't seen ANYONE read it that way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Well, he's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. here is the defintion of pedophile- why any DU'er doesn't think it applies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. To me, a pedophile is interested in the prepubescent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. WHO CARES?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Look up the definition, and you will find that you are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. That isn't correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. You're right, and you will be skewered by ignorant DUers who don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. No, that is not THE definition of pedophile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The word 'pedophile' in dictionaries, read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. There's a DAMNED good reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:12 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Sir or madam, in this Congress, violating house ethics rules is NOTHING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. I'm gay and I consider what he did pedophilia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 10:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. There is a LEGAL definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Actually under Fed law Foley's online sex talk w kids < 18 may well be a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Ah - now that's interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. BIngo n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. whatchutalkinboutwillis?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. defend him!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. I AGREE! Let the repukes defend him as not being a pedophile when he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. You'd think we wouldn't need a thread like this after what we been through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. i dont LIE for anyone. i have no desire to be them, i insist they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. Who's defending foley? Anybody around here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmbo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. The word police at Daily Kos are out in force... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
26. Personally, I'm worried about his interest in funeral homes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
27. What would Foley say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC