the dems are more interested in taking down bush than terrorists

[mopaul]

cspan caller

[spanone]

1. I don't see much difference between the two...IMHO

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

2. Terrorists/Bush = Same thing.

[Vidar]

20. Exactly. With a bigger stick, though, he does more damage.

[HereSince1628]

3. Well, at this point it's a matter of priority. Bush is more dangerous,

than the terrorists.

[madokie]

4. to get the terra' ist first you must remove the blivit

me thinks


for he stands in the way

[mattclearing]

5. Bush has done more damage to this country than terrorists. n/t

[Lost4words]

7. Kick!

:kick:

[wake.up.america]

9. Get rid of Bush, get rid of his belligerent attitude, get rid of his...

America and the hell with everyone attitude and we might see a welcome drop in terrorism as defined by the White House.

Less Errorism equals less Terrorism

[Arkansas Granny]

19. Not to mention the fact that Bush has created more terrorists

than there were before.

[Silverhair]

6. That is going to be the Republican manta during the election. NT

[ProfessorGAC]

8. Well, Duh!

If we don't have a trigger-happy moron in the White House, maybe the folks the terrorists recruit would respect us more. Hard to commit acts of terror against people you like and respect.

First things first.
The Professor

[wake.up.america]

12. How many here have been terrorized by Bush? How many have been terrorized

by an Arab?

[ProfessorGAC]

18. Never For Both

But, i've been highly concerned with everything Bush is doing. I don't fear the terrorists at all.
The Professor

[WePurrsevere]

14. Exactly!

Terrorism has increased dramatically and is much more of a threat now then pre-BushCo.

[JohnnyRingo]

10. Yep....Got me pegged

The Twin Tower attack was tragic and demanded a swift reaction, but it shouldn't have destroyed the republic.
It's not an excuse to burn the constitution and rewrite a new Buxh friendly version.

The Buxh problem seems more urgent to me.

[fasttense]

11. Well bush sure hasn't done anything to stop terrorists.

If we get rid of him we can actually catch Osama.

[ItsTheMediaStupid]

13. The war on terror is a phony PR ploy

September 11, 2001 was horrible. The response to it in taking down the Taliban was justified. However, this whole "War on Terror" routine is just PR and spin. Fighting terror is an intelligence gathering and law enforcement job. It is not a war.

9/11 didn't change a single line of the constitution or endanger the republic. It was a symbolic attack by a gang of thugs who can hurt us from time to time, but in no way endanger the republic.

The RW attack on the republic, our freedoms and the constitution is very real.

[iwanmycntrybak]

15. I haven't seen Bush get any real terrorists.

Someone needs to replace him and get the terrorists!

[eShirl]

16. Bush has done more lasting harm to U.S. than terrorists could dream of

Of course I am more interested in taking down the Bush administration. What REAL American wouldn't be, whether Republican or Democrat?

[Deep13]

17. Is the caller drawing a distinction between them?

[SammyWinstonJack]

21. "Taking down bush" might actually result in less terrorists and terrorism.

:yoiks: