60 Minutes did a segment on the No Fly List last night.
They took shots at the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), poking fun at their silly list of 44,000 names. There wasn’t much to the report – just another attempt at convincing Americans that CBS is still in the business of investigative journalism.
I got to thinking about T. Kennedy.
T. Kennedy has been on the No Fly List for some time now. Not Ted Kennedy, mind you, but
T Kennedy. I got to wondering how a terror suspect comes to be known as
T in the first place. Does he carry a Nevada driver’s license under the name
T? Does his Saudi passport identify him as
T? Does he look like Mr.
T?
60 Minutes did not touch on the
T question, but an ex-FBI guy explained:
I know in our particular case they basically did a massive data dump and said 'Ok anybody that’s got a nexus to terrorism, let’s make sure they get on the list.' ...And once that train left the station, or once that bullet went down range. There was no calling it back. And that is where we are.
So, maybe
T isn’t a terrorist after all. Maybe his name, or initial, inadvertently got dumped with all the others. Maybe
T has had the post-9/11 attention of the FBI, the CIA, or the NSA for completely benign reasons. Or maybe he got caught up in the “terrorist surveillance program” back when it was first implemented, in early 2001, immediately after Bush took office, long before we were attacked.
Yes. That might be it. They may have been keeping a file on
T since long before 9/11 even went down, before the “terrorist surveillance program” was retroactively (re-)named the Terrorist Surveillance Program. Perhaps Cheney’s people mistakenly dumped the name, or the initial, of a guy who was being surveilled by the “program” long before the “program” even started focusing on “terrorists.” Maybe that’s the applicable “nexus.”
Maybe they’ve been keeping a file on
T ever since his brother was murdered. Or maybe since his other brother was murdered. And once that train left the station, or once that bullet went down range, there was no calling it back. And that is where we are.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/05/60minutes/main2066624.shtmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17073-2004Aug19.htmlhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=446700