Faux: wants to know how you would handle terror subjects

[brettdale]

E-mail us at

[e-mail] to jump into the debate!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,221641,00.html


— What is the most important aspect of processing detainees? If you were president, how would you deal with the challenge of "stateless" detainees?

[StraightDope]

1. Well, I'd sodomize them with light sticks...

Beat them, humiliate them, rape their children and make them watch, simulate drowning, hook a car battery up to their genitals, smear menstrual blood on them, and other such, "frat pranks".

:sarcasm:... just incase it was unclear.

[Rick Myers]

2. Bring me....

The Comfy Chair!!!

[Oeditpus Rex]

6. The Comfy Chair?!?

[Webster Green]

3. Um......Let's see.......how 'bout a fucking trial?

What the hell is a terror subject?

Anyone suspected of doing anything illegal, including terrorism deserves to have charges filed, and face a trial.

Pretty quaint idea, isn't it. Has worked since 1215.

WTF?!

[VOX]

4. I'd put them all up at the Doubletree Santa Barbara...

Feed them the best catered meals, limo them around town, give them tickets to some crackerjack sporting events, and really show them a good time.

They'll drop that crazy "Islamofascism" faster than you can say, "Where do I sign up to become a tax-paying citizen, bro?"

See what a liberal softie I am? :sarcasm:

[ProgressiveEconomist]

5. Interesting word substitution--'subjects' for 'suspects'--they sound

so similar, but they have such different connotations.

A "suspect" well might turn out not to be what he or she appeared to someone else--for example, a spiteful neighbor.

If you don't know FOR SURE that someone is a "terrorist", you might be more tentave and circumspect.

[Quantess]

7. self delete