Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CARLYLE GROUP LOOKS TO BUY MAJOR MEDIA OUTLETS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:38 PM
Original message
CARLYLE GROUP LOOKS TO BUY MAJOR MEDIA OUTLETS
Carlyle Group reportedly among possible bidders for Tribune Co.
Washington Business Journal - 2:58 PM EDT Monday

The Tribune Co., the embattled publisher of the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune, is mulling an outright sale of the company, asking private-equity firms, including one based in Washington, to submit nonbinding indications of interest by the end of the month, according to a Monday report from The Wall Street Journal.

According to the report, three groups have emerged as possible bidders:

? D.C.-based Carlyle Group;
? Madison Dearborn Partners, Providence Equity Partners, and Apollo Management;
? Thomas H. Lee Partners and Texas Pacific Group.

At the moment, it is unclear whether Carlyle would bid alone or join with a group of buyers.

The report said that some bidders think the Chandler family, the largest shareholder in Tribune after the purchase of Los Angeles' Times Mirror in 2000, would accept a per-share buyout bid in the mid-$30s.

http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2006/10/23/daily12.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Carlyle buys the media outright - think how much easier it will be for bush
no longer having to pay Armstrong Williams and Gannon/Guckert under the table. They can just decree the "news" from the top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. it's called cutting out the middle man . . .
control the content AND increase your profits . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, disgusting...
Isn't their laws about companies becoming monopolies in this country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Noooooooo!!!!!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, that's just PEACHY. Goodbye, liberal media bias! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. There is no liberal media bias.
There is a bias in favor of Conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Did I forget the "sarcasm" smiley again? (Does the "V8 maneuver") nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I was wondering if you forgot the sarcasm smiley.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where is Soros when we need him here?
He's the only one that I know of with enough money to loan to a group from our side to actually make a competitive bid for this, isn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bye bye liberal media that bever existed outside the conservative
imagination anyway!
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clear Channel is considering selling some of its stations:
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/media/15radio.html?ex=1162008000&en=885fcb8aaff67c66&ei=5070

Perhaps this is the deal Carlyle might be interested in: Buying up Clear Channel stations and starting its own network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. You're going to see a rash of stories like this
if we win in November. The republican mafia will just buy up more of the media. Have they successfully laundered most of that 9 billion that disappeared in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. As a minor point
The official amount that was laundered is only a fraction and that was only a portion of what was audited in the "proposed" reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Reinvested here..
I've wondered myself, what happened to the Iraqi money?
And how could it disappear so effortlessly, unless....

I'm wondering if they will make the DU an offer, they can't refuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just a reminder: Carlyle was co-founded by a Jimmy CARTER staffer
I don't know why RUBENSTEIN made it his mission to give jobs to scads of Poppy-ites and RAYGUNites instead of making Dems rich, but Jimmy had a NEST of vipers at his breast: RUBENSTEIN, Pat CADDELL, Tweety...

*******QUOTE*******

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3994.htm

.... In a column posted yesterday on Salon.com, Joe Conason writes: "Preferring to avoid public scrutiny for obvious reasons, executives at the Carlyle Group usually say nothing about their firm's connections with the Bush dynasty. But last April 23, Carlyle managing director David Rubenstein spoke quite frankly about the comfy sinecure he provided to George W. Bush more than a decade ago -- and how useless Bush turned out to be. Whether he knew it or not, Rubenstein's remarks to the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association were recorded."

Rubenstein said, "We put (Bush) on the board and (he) spent three years. Came to all the meetings. Told a lot of jokes. Not that many clean ones. And after a while I kind of said to him, after about three years - you know, I'm not sure this is really for you. Maybe you should do something else. Because I don't think you're adding that much value to the board. You don't know that much about the company.

Rubenstein continued: "He said, 'Well, I think I'm getting out of this business anyway. And I don't really like it that much. So I'm probably going to resign from the board.' And I said, thanks - didn't think I'd ever see him again. His name is George W. Bush. He became President of the United States. So you know if you said to me, name 25 million people who would maybe be President of the United States, he wouldn't have been in that category. So you never know. Anyway, I haven't been invited to the White House for any things." ....

********UNQUOTE*******

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. That's kind of funny in a sad kind of way. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Of course they do.
The heart of the Beast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Carlyle has eyes and ears on the New York Times Board of Directors
in William Kennard

of course, they plant their 'managing directors' on many Boards

"William Kennard is currently a Senior Fellow at the Aspen Institute in Washington, DC. He is also a managing director with the Carlyle Group."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_E._Kennard



and, Bill Clinton put him in charge of the FCC

go figure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Does that mean the Orlando Sentinel too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. VIDEO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. They don't own it already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Carlyle Group Will Own The Cubs?
Say it ain't so, Joe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Could be the best thing that ever happened to the Cubbies
Just wait 'til opposing teams' stars get arrested on trumped-up charges, to be released after the Cubs series, then as we head toward the postseason (dare to dream), watch for a rash of charter flight crashes... :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Maybe that's a good thing.
Those Carlyle bastards can scoff at international laws and basic human decency, but there's no escaping THE CURSE. Maybe we should encourage this transaction—we could have Carlyle in the toilet within a couple of years!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hell they already own the voting machines don't they?
Or is that Halliburton...I get mixed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is just frightening shit. Absolutely frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. I know enemy combatants when I see them.
Waterboard the bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfisher Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. FCC regulations
were re-writtten and signed into law under the Clinton Administration (one contributor called it one of Clinton's biggest mistakes). I'm sorry but I don't think people like Clinton make "mistakes" like that. When they sign something into law they know why they are doing it.

Once upon a time the air waves were regarded as public property and lip service is still paid to that concept. In reality the air waves are another commodity up for bid to the rich and powerful. How can we expect a free press when such policies gaurantee that the media will be owned and controlled by powerful corporate interests.

Clinton's biggest mistake? or just the working out of a well thought out plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. hunh?
Edited on Fri Oct-27-06 05:53 PM by mac56
I don't see the connection here.

Are you saying Clinton made it possible for Carlyle Group to do this?

Add on edit: And purposefully so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfisher Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-28-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Thr connection is
that it was the new regulations that allow monopolization of media outlets by one company. During the run up to the re-write there was a lot of discussion about the ramifications. Professor Mark Crispin Miller was especially erudite in his analysis and warnings about the domination of media markets by just a few companies.

I am not a big Clinton fan, unlike most of the people at DU (although he seems much more laudable in comparrison to the present occupant of the white house). My point is that if Clinton was the true progressive that he is painted as being he could have refused to sign the new FCC regs and sent the whole business back for further study with greater emphasis on the "public" ownership of the airwaves as was originally conceived.

I think we all agree that the open internet has been the best source of honest inquiry and debate in our country. I am fearful that future proposals for regulation and limitation will kill that function and put an even greater damper on the free flow of news and opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. The LA Times has been the biggest critic of the Bush family in the US.
The Carlyle Group owns the Bush family. They are buying the LA Times to muzzle it.

The Tribune owns the LA Times illegally so they have to sell, since they also own an LA TV station. However, they rejected a bid by a buyer who was actually based in Calfornia. How on earth can they justify selling it to Saudi Royals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. Take Down the Monopolies People!!!
They are the greatest dangers to our economy, our democracy and our society! No company should ever have this much power and influence on people anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Do not give one more penny to tainted media. Do not pay for your own
executioner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC