|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:23 PM Original message |
Why not President Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steepler0t (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, we will get to see her in action soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. In spite of what Speaker-elect. Pelosi says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that take a two-thirds majority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Unless the evidence presented was so undebatable and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. That is exactly what I am assuming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. No, I think the standard you'd need is "beyond unreasonable doubt". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. Pelosi too smart to waste time & capital on impeachment procs. Stop smoking crack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Once the oversight investigations start, and the subpoenas are served, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cureautismnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. Here's another scenario: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kimmerspixelated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. That's very possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. I think the 25th amendment would make that unlikely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC