|
Once again, these paragons of moronhood amaze me. Is there anything they won't blame Bill Clinton (and by proxy his penis) on? For the full text of Meyer's excellent and angry piece go to: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/15/opinion/meyer/printable2182755.shtmlGood Riddance To The Gingrichites http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/15/opinion/meyer/main2182755.shtml#ccmm ^
Posted on 11/16/2006 5:46:53 PM PST by roostercogburn
Really, it's just a simple thesis: The men who ran the Republican Party in the House of Representatives for the past 12 years were a group of weirdos. Together, they comprised one of the oddest legislative power cliques in our history. And for 12 years, the media didn't call a duck a duck, because that's not something we're supposed to do.
I'm not talking about the policies of the Contract for America crowd, but the character. I'm confident that 99 percent of the population — if they could see these politicians up close, if they watched their speeches and looked at their biographies — would agree, no matter what their politics or predilections.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ... TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions KEYWORDS: This is from CBS's fair and balanced Dick Meyers. You know, he is supposed to be a middle of the road, straight shooter. Yet he always writes articles slamming anything GOP. And I cannot find anything too harsh dealing with the RATS. 1 posted on 11/16/2006 5:46:54 PM PST by roostercogburn < Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies > To: roostercogburn Together, they comprised one of the oddest legislative power cliques in our history.
Yeah, Pelosi's leading this up coming freak show. I guess this guy considers dems perfectly normal. 2 posted on 11/16/2006 5:49:05 PM PST by kinoxi < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
I especially like this line: "And for 12 years, the media didn't call a duck a duck, because that's not something we're supposed to do."
And yet.. he has said zip about Bubba Clinton, Hillary and her "security is for the little people" attitude, Byrd, and the rest of the Dem purveyors of moronicville. I know I shouldn't be surprised, but it's unbelievable to see in print.
3 posted on 11/16/2006 5:49:29 PM PST by Darksheare (In the beginning was a gate. And the gate was GOOD. Now to this gate came a BUNNY with a BIG WRENCH.) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
Media always lobs softballs to Dems and hammers Republicans.. I guess it comes with the territory...
I am still waiting to read about the 50,000 U.S. citizens that were killed in Times Square on New Years Eve 2005.... Oh thats right sorry Bush unlike Clinton acted and took out the Madman Saddam before he could get the (pick your poison) material to the terrorists for them to (pick your delivery method) use.
4 posted on 11/16/2006 5:49:44 PM PST by tomnbeverly (Ted Kennedy used the KGB to undermine Reagan. Who used Al-Qaeda to undermine Bush?) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
How can you take anyone seriously who writes things like, "99% of the population" would feel his way or that?"
5 posted on 11/16/2006 5:50:36 PM PST by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
The writer is a real dick.
6 posted on 11/16/2006 5:50:41 PM PST by EveningStar < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn This is from CBS's fair and balanced Dick Meyers. You know, he is supposed to be a middle of the road, straight shooter. Yet he always writes articles slamming anything GOP. And I cannot find anything too harsh dealing with the RATS.
Yes, and thank God that the Internet will eventually do such men in. Liars can now be exposed as such and it is only a matter of time before Liberalism is dead altogether. Thank God. 7 posted on 11/16/2006 5:50:47 PM PST by Jaysun (Let's not ruin this moment with words.) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: tomnbeverly
There is a message board at the bottom of the article. Some of the posts are really laughable.
8 posted on 11/16/2006 5:50:51 PM PST by roostercogburn < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
Hmmm CBS editorial about "good riddence" to the class of reps elected to change the Tip O'Neil "business as usual" crowd. That's a surprise... /s
9 posted on 11/16/2006 5:50:54 PM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
Long live the Blue Burqa DemocRATS! Cutting and Running from the Islamofascists is the "brave" and "courageous" thing to do.
10 posted on 11/16/2006 5:51:47 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (America! It's off with the desert BDUs and on with the lavender burqas!!!) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: FlingWingFlyer
Here is another great snippet from one of his thought provoking and fair articles:
"Don't be misled; there will be much more than $160 million spent assassinating characters this year; that's just the party money and doesn't include the cash laid out by the candidates themselves and various independent groups.
I have probably screened 60 negative ads this year and it's clear to me that this year's crop is the most scurrilous ever. The race-baiting ad run against Harold Ford in Tennessee is the most infamous example, but it is no sleazier than a dozen others I have seen.
One skuzzy ad accuses Democratic House candidate Michael Arcuri in New York of using taxpayer dollars to call a phone sex line. It turns out someone misdialed the state Division of Criminal Justice, which has an almost identical number. Ads run against Bob Casey in Pennsylvania misleadingly use actors to portray people who are supposedly Casey's cronies.
It seems there's very little that desperate candidates can't get away with anymore. And I mean that: this year's ads are simply full of lies and creepy insinuations. A good place to get a feel for the sleaze out there is at factcheck.org, a non-partisan group that monitors political ads for - get this - accuracy. By the way, factcheck.org found that while both parties have behaved poorly, the Republicans have been more outrageous. No surprise there, since they're the ones who are running behind. "
BARF
11 posted on 11/16/2006 5:53:45 PM PST by roostercogburn < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
Good thing there are no weirdo Democrats in the House.
12 posted on 11/16/2006 5:53:58 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Barney Frank, Sheila Jackson Lee, Dennis Kucinich. . . .) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn This is from CBS's fair and balanced Dick Meyers. You know, he is supposed to be a middle of the road, straight shooter. Yet he always writes articles slamming anything GOP. And I cannot find anything too harsh dealing with the RATS.
Middle of the Road at CBS is somewhere between Chavez and Schumer. 13 posted on 11/16/2006 5:55:00 PM PST by etradervic (Able Danger, Peter Paul Campaign Fraud, Travelgate, Whitewater, Sandy Berger...demand answers!) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn If Gingrich would run for Pres, I would pick him first, at least right now. Can someone dissuade me? 14 posted on 11/16/2006 5:55:30 PM PST by lawdude (The dems see Wal-Mart as a bigger threat to the US than muslim terrorists) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies > To: lawdude
I am liking initially what I am hearing about concerning Duncan Hunter. But I will investigate his history thoroughly over the next few months.
15 posted on 11/16/2006 5:58:28 PM PST by roostercogburn < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies > To: roostercogburn
Funny, no mention of the ethical problems of John Murtha, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Alcee Hastings, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, Gerry Studds, Barney Frank and a thousand other democrats past and present. I await his exposes on the moral, criminal, and ethical failings of the above.
16 posted on 11/16/2006 5:59:33 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Second To None!) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
|