|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:31 PM Original message |
DOUBLE JEOPARDY: OJ vs. Jeffrey McDonald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. Question: what is double jeoparady? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It's a rule that prohibits retrying defendants who are found innocent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. If found innocent, can't be tried again (LINK to Wikipedia article) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Double Jeopardy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. McDonald's going pretty far back, but wasn't his first trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LA lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. It wasn't a trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. McDonald won an appeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. seems like splitting hairs in McDonald case--how could he get tried again after that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. His appeal was based on speedy trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. defendants appeal when they WANT a second trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QMPMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. An Article 32 is not a trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. Was MacDonald ever retried? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QMPMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 11:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. MurderMac has only been tried once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. OK, that's what I thought, thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QMPMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Oh, no doubt that Fatal Vision is a bit biased, but McGinnis did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-20-06 12:08 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. McGinniss's book was biased. If you ever want to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QMPMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-20-06 12:21 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Fatal Justice is full of lies and half truth and was basically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-20-06 05:44 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Nor am I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
11. Here is the explanation put forth on one website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QMPMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. The website you indicated is MurderMac's own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-20-06 05:14 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-19-06 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. the question is more or less answered to my satisfaction. Thanks for input |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-20-06 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
23. I don't give a flying fugg about OJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC