Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BWAHAHAH!! ONLY 12 REPUBLICAN SENATORS SUPPORT ESCALATING IRAQ WAR!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:06 PM
Original message
BWAHAHAH!! ONLY 12 REPUBLICAN SENATORS SUPPORT ESCALATING IRAQ WAR!
Edited on Mon Jan-01-07 07:07 PM by Dems Will Win
From Novakula himself, who is good at counting GOP noses:

President Bush and McCain, the front-runner for the party's 2008 presidential nomination, will have trouble finding support from more than 12 of the 49 Republican senators when pressing for a surge of 30,000 troops. "It's Alice in Wonderland," Sen. Chuck Hagel, second-ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, told me in describing the proposal. "I'm absolutely opposed to sending any more troops to Iraq. It is folly."

What to do about Iraq poses not only a national policy crisis but profound political problems for the Republican Party. Disenchantment with George W. Bush within the GOP runs deep. Republican leaders around the country, anticipating that the 2006 election disaster would prompt an orderly disengagement from Iraq, are shocked that the president now appears ready to add troops.

The recent McCain congressional delegation was composed of sophisticated lawmakers who have made many previous visits to Iraq. They do not minimize the severity of sectarian civil war. They left their meeting with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki doubting any "sense of urgency" after advising him that he must disarm the militias. They recognize that the national police, corrupt and riddled with radicals, constitutes an unmitigated disaster.

McCain has long called for more troops in Iraq. He was supported within the delegation by his ally Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and by Sen. Joseph Lieberman, the only Democrat on the delegation (though he now calls himself an "Independent Democrat" after losing the Democratic nomination in Connecticut and being elected with Republican votes). But Sen. John Thune (S.D.) calls his support for the surge "conditional." Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) returned from Baghdad opposing more troops. Rep. Mark Kirk of Illinois, the only House member on the trip, is described as skeptical.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/31/AR2006123100931.html


BWAHAHAHAAAAHAHAAA!

Please Remember to Recommend to get the word out on this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes but you forget
* is the 'decider' and will do what the hell he pleases regardless of congress....just watch and see what happens. Should be his first meltdown....first of many I hope, but he's deluded and will think nay votes are actually aye votes and will go ahead anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Congress can not fund the escalation
But Bushco can just print dollars now without anyone counting them, as they stopped reporting the M-3 Money Supply figure.

They are already laundering 2 billion dollars a day to pay the interest on the national debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. Glad you're calling it
what it is: an escalation and not a "surge". More marketing from the Dark Side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Dopey Dozen.. how perfect..
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And one AssClown Joementum Limpmann
He loves The War so much he will send your child to die for his Handlers


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. That makes Lucky 13!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Great picture! Worth a thousand words. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. This photo and the one in socaldem's post look so similar its creepy. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. It's not the war he loves, it's the stench of w's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. He is known as Sphincter boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. kitty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good news! K and R!!! . eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmm.... You know what?
Edited on Mon Jan-01-07 07:15 PM by Independent_Liberal
No, I won't even say it. I think this speaks for itself.

:)

BTW,

Who are these dopey dozen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Novak doesn't say
The ones not running in 2008 are probably more likely to be in the Dopey Dozen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Who are they? Some are fairly predictable...
Yes: Bunning, Bond, Imhofe, Dole, all the other southern assholes from Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia and South Carolina, the two Texas assholes, McCain, Kyl, Stevens. That should get you to more than a dozen. Within this group, there are 4 or 5 who are waffling, but it's hard to say who they are.

If it really is only a dozen, impeachment is looking more and more possible, as you would have about 85 senators opposing Bush's war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. the two Texas assholes: Hutchison and Cornyn
surprise, surprise !!!

whores
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Keep your eye on Hagel
He used to own ES&S the voting machine company, and he's thinking about being selected as president- 2008.

If he can make McClain look the warmonger he is, that's one less in the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Too bad it's not up to them. The decider spoketh...(or will), and more will die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Count this: 11 Republicans, 12 Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And 1 Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I have a feeling that Hagal will get the Repug Nomination.
He will be difficult to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Good ole Mr. E S & S, himself
Edited on Mon Jan-01-07 08:37 PM by SoCalDem
he's a clever one .

Before he ran for office, he was part of that company, and whjat a co-ink-ee-dink..the obscure "nobody" guy won the lection...using the voting machines from his company ..

gee-whiz !! what 'r the odds of that happening :)


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2006112801382
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. You really believe that?
I'm surprised.
Ask anyone from Nebraska what they think about politics of that state or Hagel's first win. It was no fluke or a "co-ink-ee-dink".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Joementum is a member of the Connecticutt for Lieberman party
He is not a Democratic Senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. Hmmm....
Belonging to a party named after yourself. Doesn't that just say it all? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Who's the dem? I don't know of any. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Lieberman of course. The DINO. I wonder if he will change back to a 'D'
or remain an independent after they get sworn in this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. He's not a democrat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. He is until he is sworn in as an independent
Minor point since he is a DINO. Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bagdad Bobs number 12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Heh, looks like Bush is having trouble...
with his toadies. I guess November 2006 has got those who have to run in 08 running scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
27. Happy New Lame Duck Year! Wooo Hoooo!!!!! n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Bush the war president? - like saying my 9 year old is calling the shots around here...
Shrub is the worst person in the US. to be deciding what's best for this country, he only knows what's best for, Oil, drug companies and defense contractors.

Blood for Oil, that's the deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
30. only 12? Number supporting bush is not relevant
even if the only ones supporting bush's escalation plans were Laura and Barney - bush would interpret it as a mandate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
31. But will they stop him from bombing Iran? He wants to do it...
... will they stop him? can they?

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curiousdemo Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
33. Some repuke are smart....

enough to know, "Why should i lose my Job in 2008" for a loser. Sulfur-in-Chief is on his on. When you have a mad scientic in the house, someone need to stop him before he instruct his proxy to kill again.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
34. The entire Iraqi experience has been folly, or so it could persuasively be argued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. "McCain Doctrine"
Edwards terms Iraq surge "McCain doctrine"

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards, targeting a potential Republican rival in 2008, dubbed plans for a short-term U.S. troop increase in Iraq "the McCain doctrine," in an interview aired on Sunday.

Sen. John McCain of Arizona, considered likely to be a Republican candidate for president, has been "the most prominent spokesperson for this for some time," Edwards said in an early salvo of the 2008 campaign.

(...)

"I actually, myself, believe that this idea of surging troops, escalating the war -- what Senator McCain has been talking about -- what I would call now the McCain doctrine ... (is) dead wrong," said Edwards.

(more)

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2007-01-01T080750Z_01_N31302200_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-POLITICS.xml


Now that's a guy who knows how to get it out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Dead Wrong -- I like that
The McCain Doctrine is Dead Wrong - Makes a good Bumpersticker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
38. Is everybody's mind made up even before debate?
Is that how it works? The Prezeldent makes an asinine statement like, "More troops in Iraq means victory", and the good little ducklings line up behind him?

Are there no pros and cons to be listed, haggled over or explained?

Or is this just a case of "you're against it, so I'm for it, nyahhh"

At least we know how Lieberman will vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. that's still twelve too many.
these guys have the same mindset as the japanese soldiers that came out of the caves in the '50s- never admit defeat, even when you've lost, fight on, by god. whatever you do, don't do anything rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
43. Lugar and Specter aren't among the 12
And then we have good old Joe...

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

"In a partisan flip, Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Democrat turned independent, said he supports an expected recommendation by the White House for more troops in Iraq and argued against dialogue with Syria.

When asked if he could support sending another "20,000 to 30,000" troops, Lieberman said, "I can and I hope it's exactly what President Bush does."

http://www.komotv.com/news/national/5049266.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. And this is why I've been saying that the votes are THERE
For Impeachment, they are scared SHITLESS, and we have them on the ropes, they think the American people are going to shitcan them, so they'll take Bush out to save their own asses, in the end that's what it's all about..

As Hunter S. Thompson said, "Politics is the art of controlling your immediate environment"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. We the People of the United States will shit can them any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC