Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was It Bush That Gave The Order To Turn Him Over?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:26 PM
Original message
Was It Bush That Gave The Order To Turn Him Over?
I've heard people say that Saddam was in US custody even after his trial. Was he in US custody all the way to when he was handed over to the executioners?

If so, the only person I can see who would make that decision is Bush. I can't imagine he would delegate that decision.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. He had a stiffee...when he did....he was gleeful....
He is a sociopath...and I am sure he watched the hanging....no doubt in my mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. SCHWING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would bet money on him having a direct feed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe that it must have been bush
No military person is going to give the go-ahead to a transfer of custody of a condemned Head of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
They had standing instructions to hand him over as demanded during the trial and for execution of the sentence following its end - in between his appearances at that farce and shortly before his murder, he was in US custody.

I'm sure that arrangement had been decided at the top long ago, I'd guess in 2004 as "sovereignty" was being worked out. I doubt that anyone on the ground had any authority to say no. This whole occupation's been run from Washington. The neocons just can't trust Americans, y'see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No no no.I'm not buying that automatic shit. If he was in US custody
then somebody gave an order to turn him over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Agreed..and that very act could be prosecuted by the Hague...
Don't get me wrong....I think Saddam should have prosecuted and if found guilty...sufferred the sentence given down by the Hague...

* fucked this up and now that the cell phone recording of the taunting and actual hanging are out....Saddam is a martyr....

Can someone tell me why they would hang him at the beginning of a religious holiday in the Middle East...when religious fervor is at one of it's highest points?

Purely incompetent......purely criminal....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. It must have been done on purpose, the religious thing, because they
talked about it before hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. No! Again
You don't have to phone the order at the last moment. You can lay down the command years in advance. The crime was committed well before the killing. The "trial" itself was an affront to any notion of justice duly arrived at. But it was convenient to the fiction of a stooge Iraqi regime "sovereign" in all but practice.

Illusion vs. Reality: that's the whole issue. The neocon agenda was always to introduce us to a world where reality itself was un-American, worse than unthinkable.

How many fingers am I holding up? Of course, it doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. And no again. I'm not buying that automatic shit. Now you've expanded
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 07:42 AM by Solomon
itinto "years in advance". What horseshit. I guess they also decided years ago it would be done on an american base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. 2004
He was transferred to "Iraqi" legal custody on 30 June 2004 (the original date for "sovereignty" before it was rushed forward), while remaining in US military custody. So from then on, the US effectively determined that the Iraqis could do whatever they liked with him, but he'd remain a US prisoner until the final handover. I don't know when the trial and sentence arrangements were finalized, but US officials on the ground would still be bound by that political decisison.

The "Tribunal" itself was set up in December 2003, under the formal occupation. I think the broad policy was pretty much mapped out at top level well in advance. It's got "Made in Washington" written all over it. It suited the Administration to claim it was an Iraqi case. From that fiction, the rest follows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it was Bush, then how can they now claim they tried to stop it?
What horseshit they are shoveling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. We knew he was transfered Thursday night...
even though up until the hanging on Friday there were conflicting reports about who's custody he was in.

Once again, DU knew first.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=2993866
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Joe Scarborough just said that
he was hung on an American Base. Oh Boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. that is why I spent the whole day trying to stop this stupidity...I spent
hours on DU. Called WH... Call stupid brother's office. I was not so much to save SH but to get it through their stupid heads that Love and Compassion is the only way to run a World. I know I wasted my time. I know I was naive. But I tried. It was not about SH. It was about this f...ing country which sadly I have not given up on but..... thanks to all the folks who posted saying they too did not believe in capital punishment.

What a shocking event. It was fast. And you knew that GWB (or his folks....VP etc) were calling the shots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even worse
The gallows that they used to hang him were at a US base in Iraq. We barely handed him over because they were still on our instillation when they "carried out his sentence" (or what ever you want to call it). The whole thing just stinks too much NOT to be investigated by someone who will actually tell us the truth about what took place over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. So just like (fill in the blank) we basically hired thugs to do the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rene Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. hussein had to be silenced before the Dems take control of
Congress and begin hearings. He knew too much about Poppy and Baby bush. They'd not risk him telling info at all....especially about the gassing of the Kurds....i.e. who ACTUALLY did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Saddam might of been another sociopath like * but he wasn't
stupid....I gotta feeling he will be talking from the grave....there were other people that were there and they will talk eventually....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. Of course.
You know he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. It had to be him. That's why I'm saying they shouldn't even try to lie
about trying to stop it. Now that the thing has backfired they pretend that they had no hand in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. It will come out...
this truth cannot stay concealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC