CNN poll: Will sending 20,000 to 40,000 more troops to Iraq

[panader0]

help to stablize the country?
78% no 22% yes

Get a grip bush! the people do not want to send more troops.
www.cnn.com

[rodeodance]

1. and even Sen. Levin is saying a short surge should be taken a look at

[rpannier]

6. If he supports it...

he should have to go there in uniform.
Everyone one of those f**kers who votes for this thing should have to put on a uniform and go.

Watch how quickly they'd vote it down if it was their lives they were risking.

[npincus]

2. link?

[babylonsister]

4. Link here; scroll down, bottom right:

http://www.cnn.com/

[npincus]

9. thanks! 22-Y, 78-N

[magellan]

3. Done

Ah, the 22 percenters! Morans who need to enlist!

[rpannier]

5. Will sending 100,000 troops to Iraq stabilize the country?

No.

However, I will support a slight increase in US military presence in Iraq as long as it is:
scrub, cheney, rice, lieberman, mc cain, john gibson, charlie daniels, hannity, medved, o' reilly, kristol, hume, dennis miller, barnes and weiner (i mean savage) and they have to go to the heart of where the insurgency is strongest -- just their little group -- no real soldiers.


on note: I left on neo-kon-drech-ie because his wife has been very ill for quite sometime and he takes care of her.

[TheCowsCameHome]

7. Send the entire Bush/Cheney family.

Otherwise, forget it.

[onecent]

8. Still gets 22% of the base....where do these people live?

[azmouse]

10. done n/t

[spanone]

11. If the new congress supports this 'surge' WE NEED TO MARCH ON DC PRONTO.

[BearSquirrel2]

12. More targets ...

In those numbers, US IED targets will simply be more numerous. Think 150,000 ... or whatever Shinseki said.