Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

News: NY Times: US Shuts Down E-Voting Testing Lab

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 01:55 PM
Original message
News: NY Times: US Shuts Down E-Voting Testing Lab
The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/04/washington/04voting.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=363e471aee8b4edc&hp=&ex=1167886800&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
and on BradBlog http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3982

January 4, 2007
U.S. Bars Lab From Testing Electronic Voting
By CHRISTOPHER DREW

A laboratory that has tested most of the nation's electronic voting
systems has been temporarily barred from approving new machines after
federal officials found that it was not following its quality-control
procedures and could not document that it was conducting all the
required tests.

The company, Ciber Inc. of Greenwood Village, Colo., has also come
under fire from analysts hired by New York State over its plans to
test new voting machines for the state. New York could eventually
spend $200 million to replace its aging lever devices.

Experts on voting systems say the Ciber problems underscore
longstanding worries about lax inspections in the secretive world of
voting-machine testing. The action by the federal Election Assistance
Commission seems certain to fan growing concerns about the reliability
and security of the devices.

The commission acted last summer, but the problem was not disclosed
then. Officials at the commission and Ciber confirmed the action in
recent interviews.
More

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/04/washington/04voting.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=363e471aee8b4edc&hp=&ex=1167886800&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Something to keep an eye on. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Help keep this kicked. It's a slider - slide it under the radar of
the excietment in the House - it's an acknowledgement that the machines were not tested completely, accurately, or scientifically or for all those reasons. KICK RECOMMEND Don't let it get lost in the fun of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kicks and recs, thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. That only took, what, five years? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for the post helderheid
Kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. aaarrrghh
"The commission acted last summer, but the problem was not disclosed then."

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

Thank God we don't have to think "how different the 2006 election might have been"--especially on a wonderful day like today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. only proves what the "crazies" have been complaining
about for years. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm nuts!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good News: Ciber is part of the R. Doug Lewis cabal
I knew the name sounded familiar. This part of the black box voting machine mess.

The Election Center, run by an individual named R. Doug Lewis, also organized and trains state election officials, and, through NASED (National Association of State Election Directors) selects the certifiers of the voting machine.

Ciber is one of a series of four software certifiers for voting machines, each of whom dropped certification duties after a short time, each of whom hired Shawn Southworth to do the certification. Who chose Shawn Southworth? NASED, under the guidance of R. Doug Lewis.

I wonder if anyone has ever done a background check on Shawn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC