Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS POLL: Bush Approval 30% - New Dem Congress 68%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:01 PM
Original message
CBS POLL: Bush Approval 30% - New Dem Congress 68%
CBS Poll: High Hopes For New Congress
68% Are Optimistic About 110th Congress, But Half Doubt Democrats And Bush Will Cooperate

BUSH'S JOB APPROVAL RATING

Approve
30%
Disapprove
63%

FEELINGS ABOUT NEW CONGRESS

Optimistic
68%
Pessimistic
25%


more at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/04/opinion/polls/main2330862.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tonight I heard Bush referred to as being....
a "relatively unpopular" President by some media talking head. Relative to have a 0% approval rating, I guess.

If a Democratic president had numbers as low as Bush, it would be all the media talked about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. No Mo Popular War President
I remember when the MSM was still referring to him as "a popular wartime president" even when the numbers were sinking. Now he's just "relatively unpopular"???? People hate him, and that's what these low numbers indicate. Relatively unpopular, my ass!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. No kidding!
Remember when they used to be saying, every time they mentioned him it seemed, "this very popular President"...

Now that he is clearly very unpopular, now it's "relatively unpopular"...

Screw 'em, their bias is so blatant it's beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice numbers. Put a smile on my face, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very interesting numbers: Dems have no Iraq plan, but that's better than Bush's plan
good post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Here is an Iraq plan via Russ Feingold:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yee-Haw !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush will go lower then Nixon's ratings (28%) after investigations become revealing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who are these 30%? Can't imagine......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. What were the numbers for the last Congress, weren't they like 20% or something?
That is one monumental shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow! That optimistic number is amazing!
Makes me feel, optimistic. :) Finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Just wait until his next speech
When he comes on TV and proposes sending another 20,000 kids to Iraq as a "sacrifice?" That oughta drop him into the 20s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I agree.
The "sacrifice" BS should just drop him into the 20s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. I know that Bush can get down to 25%. I think he will make it below 25%. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Democrats have been given a mandate. Let's hope they don't fuck it up.
Don't abuse that mandate, Dem leaders. You abuse that, then you will be replaced by the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Seems like 68% is high based on the election results
Makes you wonder if the election results reflected reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This is an
excellent and scary point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You don't think the electronic voting machines could be at fault?
Nah. It must be the polls.

Somebody's manipulating those crazy polls.

There are even people who claim that factors like racial and ethnic participation, pre-election new voter party registrations, under vote or over vote percentages, unemployment figures, etc. could indicate how a vote might come out.

Fuhgedaboudit. The electronic voting machines are perfectly accurate and efficient. If you add a paper print-out, it's just going to make things worse. The paper will jam and it will slow things down. Keep it modern.

If you want a perfect election system, keep it cyber.

People are imperfect, machines are not. They do exactly what they're programmed to do. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. poll from a sample of all vs. election results from those who voted
while the midterm numbers were up, for a midterm election - they were still around 50% of all eligble voters. Vote scam shenanigans could account for some difference - but I would venture to guess that most of the difference is due to people who have an opinion - but who don't regularly vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Interesting possibility. That would mean an excess 18% or so of the nonvoting pop is Dem.
Hmmm...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Impressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Voters' #1 Issue: "Republican Corruption"
I have been following a lot of this on C-SPAN and C-SPAN2, and have been so impressed with the way things are going, and so impressed with the hugely favorable response from the American people, that I actually have hope again. I think our grim, tragic era is ending, and we have learned from it. Democrats have been passing bill after bill in the House, to get rules back against corporate lobbying, other ethics violations, and to restore checks and balances in the system, and all the Republican abusers can do about it is whine pathetically, then go along with it, because it is so popular. You don't even hear the unbroken line of belligerant, sneering anti-Democratic callers on "Washington Journal" anymore, even when that Brian Lamb tries to encourage it. There is a lot of popular support for Pelosi, the new Democratic members of Congress, and the more familiar Democrats, who suddenly now, are not being cast as having "suspect motives" by the corporate media--it doesn't work, it is a new era, and we the people are involved again. It feels like our Government and our country, and not just for the rich capitalist criminals that no one can stop.

Even the standard media hit-pieces against Democrats have a new sound to them, as if they are in a vacuum, with none of the fabricated "agreement" they worked up before, with their assembled "substitute public" on their media. A phony "report" just played on this "Countdown," where Lisa Myers "sincerely wondered" if Democrats were really any diffeerent from Republicans, and that they are supposedly consorting with lobbyists the same old way--even after the new moves to get rid of lobbying, and overhaul the corporate-written "Medicare" drug bill--never mentioned that the corporate media itself is one of the biggest lobbyists of them all, and that when politcians have to whore themselves endlessly for campaign contributions, most of it goes to pay the bloodsucking advertising rates of the corporate media itself. When politcians corrupt the system to raise all this money, it is the corporate media they give it all to. Didn't mention that minor detail, Keefy.

There is a totally new atmosphere in the country now, from women, older people, the Democratic majority, the middle class, and many other parts of the real population, and if Democrats in Congress can keep themselves on track and not get corrupted, but continue the people's work, getting the corporations out of the system, then our whole country will be brought back from the dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. We need to make sure Congress builds on that optimism and doesn't F*** it up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Future Principal Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. and the backwash speaks again. 30% he's 4 points ahead of Osama Bin Laden
surveyusa.com has him winning two states (UT and ID) and statistically even in two more (WY and ND). So, he's got a whopping 7 EVs and only 6 are up for grabs. Talk about a mandate.

Oh, and surveyusa has him at 36% which I still think is 4 - 7 points too high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Aww Shucks, Why Can't He Break Into The 20's?
Just one more point, for cryin' out loud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC