|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:05 AM Original message |
Joe Barton, a self-serving, bitter little turd who forgets whom he serves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mduffy31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Imus has been killing him for the last few months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I began watch Imus again when I hears about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. Smoky Joe serves the pollution industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. I get your outrage, but the vote against ethics reform was Dan Burton (IN) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. DAMN, ok, DAN Barton is a self-serving turd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Maybe we should all write and ask him why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
6. Actually, Barton voted for both of the ethics rule changes yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Joe Barton, almost a self-serving little turd, damn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC