Google Answer to Filling Jobs Is an Algorithm

[Herman Munster]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/03/technology/03google.html?em&ex=1168146000&en=7e201f511d0472b5&ei=5087%0A

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Have you ever made a profit from a catering business or dog walking? Do you prefer to work alone or in groups? Have you ever set a world record in anything?

The right answers could help get you a job at Google.

Google has always wanted to hire people with straight-A report cards and double 800s on their SATs. Now, like an Ivy League school, it is starting to look for more well-rounded candidates, like those who have published books or started their own clubs.

Desperate to hire more engineers and sales representatives to staff its rapidly growing search and advertising business, Google — in typical eccentric fashion — has created an automated way to search for talent among the more than 100,000 job applications it receives each month. It is starting to ask job applicants to fill out an elaborate online survey that explores their attitudes, behavior, personality and biographical details going back to high school.

The questions range from the age when applicants first got excited about computers to whether they have ever tutored or ever established a nonprofit organization.

The answers are fed into a series of formulas created by Google’s mathematicians that calculate a score — from zero to 100 — meant to predict how well a person will fit into its chaotic and competitive culture.

“As we get bigger, we find it harder and harder to find enough people,” said Laszlo Bock, Google’s vice president for people operations. “With traditional hiring methods, we were worried we will overlook some of the best candidates.”

[lumberjack_jeff]

1. 'bout time.

the current state of the art in HR recruitment tools is a simple checklist system that scans resumes looking for the words "bachelors degree" near the word "education" and sends the resumes in which these attributes are missing to dev/null.

Many applicants who could contribute meaningfully are excluded from consideration. I attribute it to laziness on the part of HR departments.

[burythehatchet]

2. Amen