|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:05 PM Original message |
Rice to testify on Iraq before Senate committee Thursday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. You're right -- Biden is running for president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Under Oath? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. He's been tough during previous hearings, even in the minority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I mistook your response -- it says "testify" above so yes I assume so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'll bet that she doesn't have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. This is why this cartoon is so dead on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. under oath? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poiuytsister (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
29. What makes me nuts when I watch her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ninkasi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. It should be heated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. Has Condi responded yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. Is Boxer still on that committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. Boxer?! I'd pay to see that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
11. How can we trust ANYTHING she says? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Hopefully whatever she says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurrayDelph (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. I just wrote to my senator on the committe (Boxer) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'd say that she'd just "play stupid," but....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
13. OMG. She lies with such unearthly aplomb, I don't know how she developed the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. it sure is fun to watch, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. only 3 recs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. i will add ONE> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. When are we going to revisit the past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Phase II should have done that--------- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. let the head bobbing begin!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. don't forget the blinky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. mmmmwaaaaa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:42 PM Original message |
lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. here's why you never see who she's dating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
19. so,his investigations are NOT of any Past actions! well well. well !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
23. What took so long. This is ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 04:39 AM Response to Reply #23 |
33. We all had to wait for the Democratic Party to be elected to the majority and inaugurated. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
27. Question, followed by Rice's verbose non-answer, with a somewhat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-05-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Boy, you nailed it. That is her precise, preferred style. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phrogman (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 03:40 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. You've nailed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poiuytsister (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Maybe she will top it off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
32. NOBODY could have imagined we would still be in Iraq today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Jan 14th 2025, 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC