|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:27 PM Original message |
Poll question: Is a nuclear iran acceptable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Is a nuclear America acceptable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. I will not vote in a stacked poll. Nuclear weapons are never acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. "Other" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 ....N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. What he said.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContraBass Black (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. What does "Nuclear Iran" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. The US Neocon Junta invasion of Iraq, which THEY KNEW didn't have nukes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's not acceptable, but the fact is using force to resolve it is going to make things a lot worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. Is nuclear nukular acceptable? I voted OTHER,. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. I voted yes, but would like to qualify my answer this way: A nuclear Iran is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. I'm not in the military, but I agree. Iran's medieval government would be too dangerous w/ them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
14. Absolutely not. The goal is to stop proliferation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
15. NO TO ALL NUCLEAR WEAPONS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. you are of course referring to nuclear for the purpose of steam generation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. elaborate please, do you mean; "what next" if Iran is jumping up & down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. It's just a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. i don't think there are any innocents in this world anymore, not at the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
18. Acceptable to whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I would imagine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. Nuclear powered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neoma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't agree with nuclear being anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
23. Compared to WHAT? A US nuclear first strike? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-06-07 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
28. other: inevitable n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC