Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Threatens Valerie Plame's Book - Won't Let Her Mention She Worked For CIA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:29 PM
Original message
CIA Threatens Valerie Plame's Book - Won't Let Her Mention She Worked For CIA
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 12:30 PM by kpete
CIA won't let outed agent say she was in CIA

RAW STORY
Published: Sunday January 7, 2007

A CIA panel has told former officer Valerie Plame she can't write about her undercover work for the agency, a position that may threaten a lucrative book project with her publisher, Newsweek's Michael Isikoff reports in Monday editions of the magazine, according to a release from Newsweek.

Plame's outing as a CIA officer in July 2003 triggered a criminal probe that culminates next week when Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby goes on trial for perjury and obstruction.

An excerpt follows:

#
But in what could be a precursor to a separate legal battle, Plame recently hired a lawyer to challenge the CIA Publications Review Board, which must clear writings by former employees. The panel refused Plame permission to even mention that she worked for the CIA because she served as a "nonofficial cover" officer (or NOC) posing as a private businesswoman, according to an adviser to Plame, who asked not to be identified discussing a sensitive issue. "She believes this will effectively gut the book," said the adviser. Larry Johnson, a former colleague, said the agency's action seems punitive, given that other ex-CIA undercover officers have published books. But even Plame's friends acknowledge that few NOCs have done so. CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield said the panel was still having "ongoing" talks with Plame to resolve the dispute. "The sole yardstick," he said, is that books "contain no classified information." A spokesman for Simon & Schuster, Plame's publisher, declined to comment.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/CIA_wont_let_outed_agent_say_0107.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. She can't mention it but the wh operatives can spew that info all
over the place? I don't think that's going to sit too well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. But wait....
I thought she just had a "desk job". :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. OK, so Bob Novak can write that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA,
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 12:37 PM by no_hypocrisy
but she can't. Got it.

In the tradition of the novel Hopscotch, I hope she reveals some really horrifying facts about how the CIA does business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. But everybody knew she was in the CIA
before the WH even said anything, so what's the big deal? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Uhmmmm. Isn't this a moot issue by now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is the epitome of the irony of our times
Surreal life, politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Geez, this is irony with a capital "I"....
The whole WH and rabid right-wing cabal's justification against the Fitzgerald investigation into the outing of Plame was that she was NOT NOC but merely a staffer at the CIA yet the CIA is not allowing her to write about her employment at the CIA BECAUSE she was a NOC.

What a pile of horse-shit, imo. This action by the CIA is a blatant move by the WH to stop the truth from coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't this news good for the two lawsuits coming up? They don't
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 01:33 PM by higher class
have to waste time with witnesses trying to say she was not an undercover operative?

I bet I know one or two who would still be willing to testify that she wasn't - Victoria Toensing and Joe DeGenova. After all, they told us many times on tv that she wasn't. They are so both in the know that they must know more than anyone else, therefore are qualified to be witnesses that she wasn't undercover. Sarcasm a plenty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Superman fans say it with me
VIVE LE BIZARRO WORLD!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. She ought to title the book, "Alice in Wonderland" (or "Through the Looking
Glass").

Only Lewis Carrol is adequate to describe this situation. And what a brilliant man he was, having the Red Queen forcing her underlings to paint all the white roses red.

There it is. "Alice in Bushworld," by Anonymous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Now *that* is rich. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. She should take the HAL approach.
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 02:10 PM by SoCalDem
Supposedly, as the myth goes, when "2001:A Space Odyssey" was being made, they wanted to use IBM computer logos, but IBM said no, so they went "one letter off" and came up with HAL :)

Valerie just may have worked for the VOS..(keyboard version..claim typo "glitch".)
or DJB ...

EDITED to add the non typo letters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Would it be the DHB ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I was looking at my computer keyboard.. She could claim a "typo"
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 02:08 PM by SoCalDem
yours is the more accurate one :)
Department of (I'm having a brain-fade day here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Department of Homeland Bureaucracy
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC