Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senior Repubs to bush: Surge DOA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:54 PM
Original message
Senior Repubs to bush: Surge DOA
Advice from Powell
http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/200053,CST-EDT-NOVAK07.article


Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who has gone public with criticism of President Bush's Iraq policy, is caustic in private about the proposed ''surge'' of 30,000 additional U.S. troops.
Powell noted that the recent congressional delegation to Iraq headed by Sen. John McCain heard from combat officers that they wanted more troops.

''The colonels will always say they need more troops,'' the retired general says. ''That's why we have generals.''

A footnote: Senior Republican senators are trying to get word to the president that any troop surge would be dead on arrival in Congress.


anybody have more on the Senior Repubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure people have plenty on the Senior Repubs, they're
probably being paid very well not to tell.

Oh, I see. Any more on them in regard to resistance to the 'plus up'. My mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Novak claimed earlier that only 12 republican senators supported the 'surge'
I imagine he's talking about all the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sure, but how would they constrain Bush? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That is the question of the moment, isn't it?
This whole situation really puts old school republican loyalty (ie. loyalty to party above all else) to the test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just wondering HOW they can stop the maniac
even if Congress doesn't approve additional funds, the Chimp will steal it from elsewhere in the Pentagon budget. So I've heard others say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. How exactly would that go down? Could they do it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC