This just in - 128 House Repukes oppose implementation of national security measures.

[jefferson_dem]

...as recommended by the 9/11 Commission.

Why do these traitors not want to protect us from "terrorism"? Do they really hate 'Merca that much????!!!!!

Aderholt
Akin
Bachmann
Bachus
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Biggert
Bilbray
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Boozman
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Campbell (CA)
Cannon
Cantor
Coble
Cole (OK)
Conaway
Crenshaw
Cubin
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Davis, David
Davis, Jo Ann
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
Drake
Dreier
Duncan
Ehlers
Emerson
English (PA)
Everett
Fallin
Feeney
Flake
Forbes
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gilchrest
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goode
Goodlatte
Graves
Hastert
Hensarling
Herger
Hoekstra
Hunter
Inglis (SC)
Issa
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
King (IA)
Kingston
Kline (MN)
Lamborn
Latham
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lucas
Lungren, Daniel E.
Manzullo
McCarthy (CA)
McHenry
McKeon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Musgrave
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Poe
Price (GA)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rehberg
Renzi
Reynolds
Rogers (KY)
Rohrabacher
Royce
Sali
Saxton
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Souder
Stearns
Sullivan
Tancredo
Terry
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Walberg
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll015.xml

[annabanana]

1. And the first political ad for their opponents is born.

"There are some who have forgotten the lessons of 9/11"

[jefferson_dem]

2. They clearly have a 9/11 mentality. Are they with us or with the terrorists?

Why can't they understand that, in this clash of "GOOD vs. EVIL", they are siding with ... :evilgrin: ?

[liberalnurse]

9. Indeed!

:woohoo: :rofl: :applause: :rofl: :woohoo: :applause: :hide:

[Lucky Luciano]

21. K&R - good to have a list of traitors for all to see. nt

[porphyrian]

3. 128 House republicans support the terrorists. - n/t

[madrchsod]

4. why?

why would they vote against it? is all about the money?

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

7. If it's Republicans voting, it's all about the money.

Some of these security measures would cost their corporate masters money. And we can't have that, can we?

[blm]

15. Exactly - port security has been an issue for some time, but corpmedia barely

gives it the attention it needs. WE, the public, forced the Ports deal onto the radar. Of course, it just postponed it for the fascists while they came up with a roundabout plan to make it happen.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

8. absolutely. scanning freight will add to the cost of product

with wages and loss of time to market. remember big business doesn't buy american parts anymore. Hmmm. Maybe this will make them start.

[madrchsod]

22. oh yes the out sourcing problem

most of our manufacturing base depends on imported sub assemblies

[Laura PourMeADrink]

5. Yes ! And they are all whining like little babies about how the

rules weren't fair and that's why they are against it. Well, welcome to the other side. No one at a future date will remember the rules issue. They will remember that you voted no.

[SeattleGirl]

6. Because they are still on their fear kick.

Didn't work in November though, did it?

[More Than A Feeling]

10. And the breaking of the Republican Party begins.

I can't wait for all of the "Republicans are in disarray" stories.

[GenDem]

11. Of course, my congressman made that list.

And we worked so damn hard to try to unseat him.

[Daylin Byak]

12. Who's that, if I may ask

The good news is that my Repuke Rep is not on that list and I goy no problem with that.

My condolences go out to all those who's Repuke Rep made that list and supports the terrorists and the corporate whores.

[GenDem]

14. Tom Reynolds

What pisses me off is our district is very close to the Canadian border and by voting against it -- he voted against our districts safety. I will remember this for LTTE's in '08.

[jefferson_dem]

18. His time will come. He only eeeked his way through because old Jack Davis

didn't put up much of a fight. He just sat on the lead while Reynolds slimed around telling lies. 2008, the Dems will field a *real* candidate and...say "buh-bye" to Tommy!

[GenDem]

20. I made over 2000 phone calls for Davis,

wrote 4 LTTE that were published, and spent two Saturdays doing a lit drop in the cold. I complained to Jack's campaign manager after it was over that I did expect the candidate to work as hard as the volunteers did. Jack was definitely a different kind of candidate.

I don't know -- we're hearing rumblings that Jack may try a third time. He will be 74 by then. :shrug:

[Bitwit1234]

13. See Sennennsbrener from Wisconsin

is one of them.....he's the guy who thought he was such hot stuff to take the speakers away from the dems when they were having a meeting and called security to throw them out...he needs to be beaten in an election.

[Daylin Byak]

17. Too bad Bryan Kennedy couldn't beat Fat Jimmy

I can't stand Sensenbrenner, he's nothing but a fat slob with a annoying squeaky voice, he showed his true colors during the Judicary committee hearings on the renewal of the patriot act when a Dem was speaking Sensenbrenner would cut off there mikes and the lights would dim.

[Eric J in MN]

26. Sensenbrenner got 62% in November.

If he's involved in a scandal, and/or the Democratic candidate is great, he could be beaten.

But with no scandal and an ordinary opponent, he'll win again in 2008.

[spanone]

16. The Terror of Politics. That's All That Frightens These Jerks.

[Bitwit1234]

19. The democrats should yell - loud and long

that the republicans are the ones who say they are better on national security. So now the democrats should tell the American that the republicans are voting against national security. And they should do the same if bush veto's it.

[williesgirl]

23. I'm calling Wolf's (VA) office tomorrow morning to voice my displeasure and remind him

his term is up in 08 and I'll vote against him.

[seabeyond]

24. thornberry.... my representitive. why do you hate america so?

i am going to send him an email. why will you not protect me? you promised. you lied to me. lol

[Eric J in MN]

25. Was there a controversial part of the bill? NT

NT

[LibDemAlways]

27. The idiot repuke in my district

Elton Gallegly actually voted "aye" on this one. Maybe since this is his last term and he's just keeping the seat warm for the next R, he no longer feels the need to be a complete Bush rubber stamp. I'm shocked.