|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:45 AM Original message |
12 percent of Americans support sending more troops to Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. Let's see how they spin 12 percent into a "mandate." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. First they say that the 36% figure supports "the surge"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. If only Barney were in favor of the surge, it would be a MANDATE. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkeyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. Dam they must be the Free Republic they got counted LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YDogg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. require that 12% to go to iraqnam, and watch that number fall to nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lectrobyte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. I hear the enlistment age's now up to 42. Surely enough of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debau2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. My thoughts exactly! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. Those 12 Percenteers should SIGN UP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Sign up? They're too busy doing "hard work" and can't be bothered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. they'd support bush if he dined on a baby on TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. Recommended. Let's get the TRUTH to Greatest, folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. K&R. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
13. a kick and #5 recommendation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. Apparently they are the only 12 percent that COUNTS because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
specimenfred1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. So 88% "drank the Cindy kool aid" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Bookmarking for kicking tomorrow morning (GMT +1). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian_rd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'd say about 12% also think George W. Bush receives messages from God |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. What we've got here is a near total loss of public confidence in Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. No matter who was president I don't remember public support for Vietnam... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You remember incorrectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I knew Johnson's numbers were low. This is what must have thrown me off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. I saw the same article-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Bush has lost his mind. Johnson was a jerk, but he wasn't crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Bush isn't listening to voices in his head; he's listening to Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. He's crazy if he thinks we'll put up with this nonsense much longer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Makes me wonder how a lone nut like that can stay in power for so long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Please. Bush isn't a "lone nut." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. That was my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. I wonder how much public confidence the Dem party will get. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. That will depend on how effective they can be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. My last kick for tonight. The word is SPLURGE, not SURGE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
24. I wonder how many Germans wanted Hitler to invade the USSR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huskerlaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
25. Well, at least we can fairly safely say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
27. wow that 12% of sheeple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
35. A good number of them post at FR & those other places. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-10-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yet some here argue that the other 88% needs a draft to "wake up". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-11-07 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
37. Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-11-07 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
38. Get used to it America, you got a genuine DICK-TATER now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-11-07 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
39. Who is stopping these elite 12%'ers from going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC