Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orem City Council Votes for Paper Ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:56 PM
Original message
Orem City Council Votes for Paper Ballots
Orem Council votes for opscan paper ballots
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650221750,00.html


Orem Council votes for paper ballots

OREM — The Orem City Council agreed Tuesday night that using
paper ballots read by an optical scanner would be a far more
cost-effective way of voting than borrowing expensive touch-screen
machines from the county.

City Recorder Donna Weaver presented pros and cons to the
council about the different voting methods, recommending the paper
ballot as the most logical choice.

Borrowing 143 touch-screen Diebold machines and the
corresponding encoders and memory cards from Utah County would cost
the city between $28,000 to $33,000 for a primary election. The cost
would increase to $38,000 to $43,000 for a general election — far
greater than the city's annual election budget of $56,000.

The paper ballots where voters fill in small ovals with a pencil
are a significantly less expensive choice, Weaver said, yet still
maintain the speed and accuracy of results because of the optical
scanner.

Optical scanning has been in place in several states for more
than 20 years, Weaver said, and is already used in Utah in connection
with provisional and absentee ballots.

Orem previously used punch cards, but the technology needed to
read the cards is quickly becoming outdated and difficult to find.

"We want the most user friendly for voters and for the workers,
and the one that would give us the most accurate return — that's
crucial,"

said Mayor Jerry Washburn. "I have no qualms in following this
recommendation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. good for them!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If we don't impeach these guys, we damn well better be sure we have
fair elections to make sure these assholes never take over again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC