Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Connecticut's SHAME - (I) Joe Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:46 PM
Original message
Connecticut's SHAME - (I) Joe Lieberman
One of the few Senators, from both sides of the isle, to stand front and center with * and his illegal, immoral, and disastrous Iraqi war.

This idiot was elected by Repukes and Independents. I hope they are happy with the results. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup.
I so wish that we'd been able to send Ned. I wish he were up there ripping into Bush with the rest of them, instead of Lieberman standing there doing what he's doing, rubber-stamping Bush. "Connecticut for Lieberman", indeed. Sure as hell not all of us. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've also been having visions of 'what might have been'.
:wtf: Connecticut??????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's face it - Republicans got the better of us on this one.
They, wisely, didn't run a legit candidate, allowing CT Republicans to defect and vote for Joementum. Had they run someone, we'd have Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't think CT Repubs alone could have elected him.
There had to be a lot of Indys and Dems. I'm not from CT so this is just mho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. He got roughly 3/4 of the Republican vote
a third of the Democrats and half of the Independents. Republicans put him over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. But, according to your data, they were not alone in electing him.
The Indys and Dems who voted for him share responsibility. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The 1/3 of Dems do
It wasn't the Indys, they were pretty much evenly split. That 3/4 of the Repubs eschewed their party candidate makes Smokin' Joe by far the preferred Republican choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I don't know about a lot.
Connecticut went to Kerry by a 54-45 margin in 2004.

In 2006, Lieberman won by a 50-40-10 margin. If you're playing strictly by the numbers, which is admittedly unwise, all but 15% of his vote likely came from Republicans. So, about 85,000 Democrats/Independents stood with Lieberman in Connecticut, which isn't all that surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. don't disregard that 20-25 percent of democrats also voted for him in the general election.
It's a shame, but Lamont also didn't run a very effective campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. With the future of this country at stake,
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 01:06 PM by MyPetRock
Lamont's campaign should have not been factored into their votes. Of course, I'm not from CT so it's very easy for me to second guess them, but again,
:wtf: Connecticut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. AND There's The REAL Rub!! The Democrats Behind Closed Doors
who supported him and sold out their own party!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC