Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Home Depot shareholders sue, ask judge to freeze Nardelli's $210 million severance payment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:43 PM
Original message
Home Depot shareholders sue, ask judge to freeze Nardelli's $210 million severance payment
http://www.smartmoney.com/bn/ON/index.cfm?story=ON-20070111-000930-1541

Shareholders Fight Nardelli's Severance Pay

CHICAGO (Dow Jones) -- Home Depot Inc. investors are asking a Georgia judge to block the retailer from giving $210 million in severance to former Chief Executive Robert Nardelli, in the latest demonstration that executive pay packages are outraging shareholders.


Shareholders, led by the Pontiac, Mich.'s public-employee retirement fund, have filed a request for a temporary restraining order in Superior Court of Fulton County, according to published reports.


The Pontiac fund filed a lawsuit in September charging that Atlanta-based Home Depot (HD) executives and its board members backdated options and had given Nardelli, who was hired in October 2002, an exorbitant amount of money. The company has admitted to the backdating, but said it was done before Nardelli's time.


Home Depot spokesman Jerry Shields said the company could not comment on the request.


Nardelli resigned last week with a $210 million package, which included a $20 million severance check and about $77 million in deferred stock rewards, among other payments. The severance pay, dictated by a contract, comes on top of multimillion-dollar wages and compensation that Nardelli already has received.


The legal action shows how CEO pay is likely to be the hot button for shareholders this year, dominating proxies and annual meetings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Shareholders need to assert themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes It Needs To Be Made An Issue
CEOs of US public corporations have been ripping off investors and employees for 20 years. Every year there is outrage but nothing is done. The Democrats have had this issue handed to them on a platter that most American citizens see as greedy and unfair. Only the Business Roundtable would oppose that something being done.

I believe that laws should be established giving shareholders a direct vote in all senior management compensation plans over and above a marginal compensation amount, and also tying or limiting senior management compensation in pensions or special bonuses to a multiplier of median worker compensation. In short it must be controlled as their greed is taking out of the overall US economy for a limited number of elite individuals that have zero accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. This kind of comp is an outrage...
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 11:04 PM by Lucky Luciano
I have always supported the pay that LLoyd Blankfein got at Goldman Sachs and what Mack got at Morgan Stanley. However, those guys did great things for their companies that have benefited BOTH employees and shareholders tremendously. I commend their efforts and their huge bonuses were justified. So, I am not as far to the left as most people on this board.

Nardelli, on the other hand has his company's stock in the shitter. It is an absolute outrage that someone can be such a fuckup and get so much compensation - in fact, he got quite a lot more than both Blankfein and Mack - COMBINED! Blanklfein and Mack played integral roles in the profitability of their companies. Blankfein was a head of trading for a group that made a ridiculous number of billions before Hank Paulson left the job of CEO for Sec of Treasury - Blankfein filled his spot and got a justified bonus - he would have had that bonus even if he were not promoted to CEO - the heads of trading usually make as much as, and even more than the CEOs quite often - others at Goldman made more than Blankfein this year in fact, but they made more money for the bank in trading that did Blankfein I guess. Look at a chart for HD for the last ten years - it has done terribly. Had HD's stock quadrupled during his tenure with a rosy outlook ahead, I would say the pay is justified and that he earned it (such things do not occur by luck) - remember that a lot of pension and other retirement money is tied up in HD stock. Employees are treated better in those circumstances too(unless you are at WMT :( ).

The guy should have been fired long ago and given $250K while he looks for another job. Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Shit.
My aspirations of getting an eight digit salary for not working at Home Depot have just evaporated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lovely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC