Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the writing of the Bush Surge Speach.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 03:53 AM
Original message
On the writing of the Bush Surge Speach.
Having heard the original speech that Bush delivered I was unaffected of the specific writing of the speech until I had a chance to truly look over the transcript. To break down the speech into its parts is both simple and completely fractured.

To start there are the lip service sections of the speech. In it the wording is best called lip service conciliatory speech. By themselves they fill a mark that was needed to some level, yet fall far short, as this administration has in the past. The peppering of these humilities are nothing more than platitudes thrown without sincerity can be seen directly in the speech when the subject of the surge is addressed.

Filler is rife in this speech as well, multiple parts of the speech have more than 10 ‘;filler’ words starting sentences. These are rarely anything more than a foolish way to appear more intelligent by stating things the longest possible way without saying anything that anyone doesn’t already know. This filler is heavier around the subjects that skirt near the war.

Of course disaster and the PNAC cheerleader call can’t avoid appearing in the speech with both 9-11 and the appearance of Terrorists show up throughout the speech, insurgents and freedom share strange bedfellows as well.

The strategy laid out in the speech is almost a crime to be termed strategy. It easily comes across identical to the strategy that has already been applied, especially in the light of how those who have disagreed with Bush have been fired or shifted somewhere else.

The quick zinger near the center of the transcript about Iran and Syria though is the part that is most chilling, especially when put in the light of the actions the US has taken in the past 24 hours. A prime example being the Iranian Embassy in Iraq being invade and raided after the speech was delivered.

All in all the best way to describe the overall writing of this speech would be like that of a matador trying to egg on a bull with a red cape; only to be fair one must note that this matador is wearing slippers and doesn’t realize that his sword is made out of rubber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. The line he read about Lieberman was pure snide politics. He looked and sounded
stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC