|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
BushOut06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 09:50 AM Original message |
The fact that Condi has no children is VERY relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm not so sure about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Maybe because they know their spawn will never have to fight and possibly die for their lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. Having children is a precondition for having compassion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. no, having a personal stake in the 'sacrifice' that Rice say she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #28 |
35. What personal stake does Keith Olbermann have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Kieth Olbermann doesn't send people off to die in unjust wars... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #43 |
49. thank you! Beelzebud- you answered perfectly- n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. Not the question. If the issue is that childlessness makes one IGNORANT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. unless you are prepared to engage, childlessness does by definition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jokerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. "Straight-up selfishness"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. That is how they think, jokerman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. How many kids do you have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #66 |
91. 1, hubby has two, lost two, and we have 6 g-kids... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #63 |
85. I don't have children (not altogether by choice, btw) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC Quake (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #63 |
88. You definately know how to hit a nerve hard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. every single person that has responded here seems to have not understood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jokerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. You make less sense with each post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. restating the OP sub-line, Jokerman, in that you are so far off the map... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #100 |
126. Deleted message |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. Ignorant is an accurate description of your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. disagreed, there is clearly a vehement reaction from many who have not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #101 |
113. What does that last clause even mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #93 |
106. Nonsense. When I didn't have kids I was not ignorant of what it means to have them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #63 |
95. That is a breathtakingly blanket statement, I cannot accept it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #63 |
107. Selfishness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #107 |
117. And that statement was just as bad as the original - in the opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #63 |
116. Arent you camparing Neo Cons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
147. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SanCristobal (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 09:29 AM Response to Reply #61 |
124. Isn't Olberman bad in bed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #61 |
144. That's not the issue at all MJ. Why discuss BS spin instead of the issue BB raised & what she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
115. Thank you, I have no kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #28 |
58. Boxer was just proving her point, that Condi does not have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L A Woman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. but if she HAD children... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #67 |
77. were your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. I was just thinking about this the other day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. forgive me for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #86 |
129. Hilarious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #129 |
136. the more kids, the bigger and better house and more toys! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #86 |
134. Do you seriously think that child tax cuts are enough to buy an large expensive house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #77 |
133. Poor families and children don't exist. It's just that crazy liberal media. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #67 |
81. Self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Boxer acknowledged Condi's compassion. But compassion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
44. But Boxer didn't refer to Condi's "childless" status |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. That's really just bullshit. Having kids or not is not relevant to policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
64. Exactly right, that's exactly why the "liberal" media is choosing to focus on that silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
4. The fact she has no children is irrelevant. Bush has kids and he's an ass. I have no kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BushOut06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. No, you're not making policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. BS. Cheney has kids. Bush has kids. Did that improve their understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
25. On the contrary, she's saying that Condi is ignorant - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Not having children makes a woman ignorant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. EXACTLY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
130. Only if that woman sends other people's children off to die. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #130 |
143. Then she's just ignorant - not because she's childless. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #4 |
50. If that is dissing, Boxer dissed herself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
6. No it isn't. Even if she had children, she'd still be cold and unfeeling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Dragon Lady Bush comes to mind on your first point...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. Boxer was out of line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #7 |
48. See my post re what Boxer actually said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
92. Boxer pointed out that Condi "had no skin in the game" so it was easy for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
112. Boxer never called Rice "Childless" - she referred to immediate family, which includes siblings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
9. Sorry, but it's not relevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pennylane100 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
12. I think she meant that Condi would not experience the loss of a child. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
13. Rice can't know what a mother feels about her childen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You mean someone like Barbara Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Her kids were born to ruin the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. So what does having children have to do with it? It's just bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. She'll never have to send her kids off to war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Again, BULLSHIT. How many kids does Cheney have? How many does Olbermann have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. You win. I'm sure she'll make a fine president after all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Another strawman? Embarassing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:35 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. I have kids, and I don't think it makes me any more qualifieed to comment on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
104. Babs thought "Rule" was spelt Ruin LOL ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
105. Babs thought 'rule' the world but 'ruin' is how it turned out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #13 |
29. I think my own interpretation of what Barbara said is this:. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammythecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
31. If I were a mother, I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mikey929 (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
15. Kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
16. But King George needs a son to carry on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
17. load of crap.nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammythecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
18. I don't know if she intended it this way, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
21. I have to agree with the majority here. Being childless doesn't equate to lacking compassion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
22. I think Boxer put it wrong. Condoleezza can't identify because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
27. It's just as relevant as asking if a leader has combat experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
36. it isn't 'children' it is a personal stake in this 'game'- and Rice has none- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. And if she had children would she have a personal stake? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. no- just as Sen Boxer pointed out- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #46 |
62. So her childlessness IS NOT RELEVANT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #62 |
87. as far as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
37. Condi has no compassion and having children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
40. For 6 years Dems have been called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
42. more tired old bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Velma, I know you are a strong feminist as I am, but this isn't what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. thank you for the clarification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Thank you for your response! You are so right about people without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #51 |
137. thank you for the clarification on what Boxer said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jokerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
45. I have no children... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #45 |
56. EXACTLY. There is no logic to the premise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
47. there is something seriously wrong with Rice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
53. she can be attacked for many things but not having children isn't one of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #53 |
109. Spot on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
54. HOW DARE SHE NOT HAVE A CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIE RECIPE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
57. No actually the fact that she has no children is none of Sen. Boxer's damn business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Boxer never referred to Rice about not having children. Just gave her examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Read what she said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #60 |
71. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #71 |
94. choosing not to birth a child is a personal and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #60 |
89. look deeper- she clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:24 PM Response to Reply #60 |
146. Read more of what she said. In context. From the transcript. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
68. I don't see how it's relevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #68 |
97. That was not what was said by Boxer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedStateShame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
69. Has it occurred to anyone that this is only an insult to one side? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
72. WTF? How has having kids influenced Bush, Cheney, etc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Well they're MEN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. I'm surprised that this sentiment has any support on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
75. Condi will not have a "Personal" loss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poiuytsister (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
76. My son is an airman about to leave for Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
78. BOXER NEVER SAID CHILDREN, SHE SAID IMMEDIATE FAMILY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Aunts and uncles aren't immediate family. But SO FUCKING WHAT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. I guess you missed the part before that where Boxer said about her own family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. No, I got that too. But it doesn't excuse her making a dumb comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. thats what she meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #84 |
99. BINGO! THAT is what Senator Boxer meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
79. It's not relevant at all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
102. Horseshit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
103. Since their drinking episodes, Jenna and Barbara have disappeared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
108. this whole flap is just desperation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #108 |
139. You're right. It wasn't a personal attack on child free people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
110. If a Republican smeared a childless Democrat this way, you'd be up in arms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caria (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
111. Once again they are attacking a dem as a diversion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
114. 49 yrs old, I have no kids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
118. I heard a commentator, not sure where, say that Boxer blew what she meant to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Who among us could hold up under such scrutiny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-12-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
120. Childless and anti-war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hailtothechimp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
121. Two kids here. And I would do ANYTHING to keep them safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdpeters (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 05:33 AM Response to Original message |
122. And that's how the right wing redirects the debate on worthless distractions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #122 |
131. Roger that n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #122 |
132. And some in their rightious indignity are eating it up with a spoon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaglass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
123. I don't think that just because someone has children they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SanCristobal (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
125. Condi is a hottie! Boxer is just jealous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Retired AF Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
127. I checked NOW's website expecting to see this headline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. no double standard- Boxer said nothing of the kind- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #128 |
135. well put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #128 |
149. Exactly, she basically said neither of them were in a position to pay a personal price in terms of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #127 |
150. The era of arrogant, uniformed, antagonistic misogyny on DU is so OVER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raysr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-13-07 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
138. No apologies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
140. Why is it that when sending people off to be killed is discussed, people think that the issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
141. what's Chimpy's excuse? Father of 2. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
142. Folks --Puhleeeeeeezz don't fall for or feed the BOGUS controversy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
145. she supports a war that used 1000 tons of uranium that now burns Babys in the Womb till the sun dies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-14-07 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
148. Amazing Dems would respond to FOXnews senselessness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC