Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House requires media to use Fox News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:36 AM
Original message
White House requires media to use Fox News
Yesterday (January 12th) the White House Correspondents' Association sent a strong letter of protest to White House Counselor Dan Bartlett, expressing their opposition to the fact still photographers, who are in the White House pool, were not allowed admission to the President's speech last Wednesday night. Instead, media outlets were required to use a "screenshot" generated from the FOX News feed. The full text of the letter is printed below. I expect that we will hear about this on FOX News, with the signers of the letter cast as left-wing crazies who hate President Bush.

The letter:

Dear Dan,

On behalf of the White House Correspondents’ Association, and in conjunction with the White House News Photographers Association, we are writing to express our outrage that still pool photographers were denied access to the White House library on Wednesday evening. As you know, following weeks of preparation and the White House build-up leading up to the presidential address, this was a significant foreign policy speech. Forcing newspapers and magazines to rely on a “screen grab” photo from the Fox News network pool feed is simply unacceptable.

In recent months, there has been a growing pattern of restricting pool photographers to White House events, but the situation Wednesday night for this important speech to the nation is the most glaring.

We expressed our concern to Tony Snow and Dana Perino earlier today, and join the WHNPA in asking that this practice end. These photographers provide a vital service to wires, magazines and newspapers around the world, while also serving as a lasting historical record to the events of our times. In addition, a White House photo release is never an acceptable substitute for independent news coverage. Therefore, in our strongest terms possible, we want to express our disappointment that a decision was made to keep even a single pool photographer from the room, and ask that it never happen again.

Regards,

Board of Directors - WHCA
Steven Scully, C-SPAN
Ann Compton, ABC News
Jennifer Loven, Associated Press
Peter Maer, CBS News
Steve Holland, Reuters
Doug Mills, New York Times
Ken Walsh, US News & World Report
Ken Herman, Cox Newspapers
Mike Allen, TIME

http://www.newshounds.us/2007/01/13/white_house_forces_media_to_use_screenshots_generated_by_fox_news.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well well well, welcome to the party, kids
Do you honestly think Tony Snow and the White House CARE about your "outrage?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Only 6 years late, corporate media lackeys
get a frikkin clue about the Propaganda Catapulters of the republicon party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hang out with dogs and
you catch fleas. MSM earned this total disrespect for complicity in Bushcos crimes. Further the speech was recorded and I guess FUX is willing to keep secrets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. And if it does happen again? What will they do? Lay back and take it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Was his "live"speech pre-recorded?
Why else would they preclude still photographers from it?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ding ding ding! We have a winner.
That's exactly why they weren't allowed. Fox, of course, isn't going to "leak" this detail...other networks tho, might not be so willing.

Let's see if they do some digging to find out the truth of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I thought it was very strange that, during what was billed as the most important...
...speech of his Presidency, he had a minor audio problem at the beginning (not enough to mess up the message, mind you). Was this audio glitch done on purpose to give the illusion of a "live" speech? Or, perhaps it was just the best take they had before the Chimp nodded off for good?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. It was obviously taped. Is the White House saying it wasn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. I think most people assume that a "Presidential Speech To the Nation"
is live. It's usually assumed and even if the WH didn't specifically say that it was, they do know that that's what most will think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Appearantly WH press corps thought it was taped even beforehand
One of those friend of a friend of a friend deals.

A reporter for Christian Science Monitor appearantly said they didn't hold the usual lottery to have press there live. They were told an hour in advance and everyone in the press room basically just accepted that the feed was taped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. Bingo
It was pretty obvious that it was prerecorded. I was surprised that more of a stink wasn't made on DU about it but I guess the gaslighting he did overshadowed whether it was prerecorded or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clue to press. The WH could give a shit what you want or think.
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 07:21 AM by thepurpose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. I say they start using old file photos of Bush .......
Like this one .....





Use this a few times and the problem will be solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Time for the M$M
to show the world the real George Bush.

They've got all the videos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. yes, that would solve the problem
Or the one where he is giving the press the middle finger.

Thanks for the first laugh of the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. I think they should run with it and not use ANY photos --
but instead, a blank space saying why there was no photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. OK guys! The gauntlet has been tossed... You are now back
on the same side of the wall as we are. YOU have the resources to fight back. The question is, Will You?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nothing Of This Has Been Mentioned. It Is FORBIDDEN For The Press To Talk About It nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yesterday I was willing to bet it was Fox doing the taping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. I can't believe Scully was part of this
He is as right wing as his brother who shoved Medicare reform down America's throat and withheld information from Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Who is Steve Scully's brother who did this... He comes from a family of 14
and I'd be :scared: to think that there are 13 others who are as RW as "Stevie" is out there making mischief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. The "White House Library" isn't a library; it's a movie set.


Didn't know this until I watched a program on UK Channel 4 the other night, in which a former UK ambassador interviewed Karl Rove inside that "library."

It's just a set. We don't normally get to see the peeling paint on the wall to the right of the "bookshelf" because it's off-camera.

Of course it was all pre-taped. I doubt there is room inside the studio for any reporters. Except, of course, the toadie from Faux.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. There is a library in the WH on the ground floor
I have no idea if this is the same library that was used in the speech, but it has two windows, two doors, a very large fireplace, and not much in the way of book shelves. It is pretty small though, 26 ft x 22 ft. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_%28White_House%29

I suspect you're right, it probably was pre-recorded in the Library with the excuse that the press core couldn't possibly fit in such a small room, but then again, the Oval Office isn't much bigger with its long and short axes being 36 ft and 29 ft respectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. It looked like exactly the same bookcase as the one in the studio.


Pretty sure it's the same lamp, too.

But you're right, and I should have been more clear in my post.

I should have said that any speech that is televised and reported to be coming from the White House Library is, in all probability, coming from this studio.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Great find - but not surprising, is it?
And even on tape he flubbed several lines...

(I said flubbed, not snorted...) :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Flub - verb
To inhale sharply with force.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
21. Dan Bartletts response. Go fuck yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Jeez. Clinton didn't even have private counsel, and the Bush Administration
gets proprietary over a public photo at a public event?

WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. i don't know if this proves anything, but i have a screen shot
from c-span feed where, right after the speech, there was a picture of the white house in the background and the presidential seal overlaid with the word "PRIMARY" below it.

did they switch from the "tape" to the primary feed? it was on for only a second or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. ahum.....media: Stop covering * and goons:: not any coverage
of his "photo-ops"....just tell the item and back off..............* has told you all to go to HELL and you are only to blame yourselves!!!!Suckers.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. ...no one to blame but themselves
Absolutely! They've been propaganda outlets for the neocons, withholding facts from the American public, and this is what they get for their efforts. They deserve the abuse they're getting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xkenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
28. Where were those Bush enablers the past 6 years?
They sowed the crop by being lackeys to the forming dictatorship. Now they're harvesting the stinkweed and complaining about the stench. Ptui!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
29. Unless one is on the Liberal Internets....American People will never hear about
this latest. Was Bush so drunk or drugged he had to tape his speech? Why not be upfront and say the speech was taped? Would anyone have cared if it was taped or not if they announced it. What is the White House staff covering up? It must be pretty bad...worse than we imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. They should have refused ...

The other networks should have refused to to show it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC