Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain "opposition to surge must spell out consequences"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:54 AM
Original message
McCain "opposition to surge must spell out consequences"
OK dickhead, allow the left to retort.
We don't like the surge because it is just an extension of the failed "stay the course" strategy. We never supported the war because we knew that Iraq would be a mess, thus requiring occupation, for decades.
We knew that violence would not reduce terrorism or make the world safer. I got the names of over 3000 brave folk that most likely would agree with me.
You want to know the consequences of "no surge", well here it is.
Iraq will not be a unified, pro-west, democratic, stable nation. (I never thought that it would be)

If you want me to support the surge, send 200000 troops (which is what this hairbrained scheme needs), which imho constitutes overwhelming force, commit them for 10 years, and give them clear and achievable objectives.

Anything less then this is uncivilized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mccain
Your putting off the inevitable. bush has all ready lost the war, and his plan is to put off leaving to the next president. He owns it, you own this. You lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Proponents of "surge" refuse to spell out consequences - why
should McCain expect those who are saying 'no deal' to have to explain themselves.???

The man is not credible or stable I believe.
Regardless of his military experiences, or (and I say this with respect, and much thought) because of those experiences.

Traumatic life experiences change you forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. So true. And they refuse to talk about what happens if it fails.
Their only response is 'failure is not an option'.

Bull. With this GOP group Failure 101 appears to be a required course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. it makes me so
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Consequences yessserrrie!!!! PEACE PEACE and MORE PEACE!!!! Yeeehaaw!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I doubt there will be peace
I'm sure there will be more violence, until a stable force can provide security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cost benefit analysis: no benefits, all losses
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 10:39 AM by teryang
Putting more lives and resources into an effort that has palpably failed to produce any benefits and only caused tremendous losses is against basis defense economic policy. McCain knows this, he took the course at the Naval War College, it's called Defense Economics 101. The basic principle of the course is cold calculation, sunk costs are no costs. The past costs/sacrifices made in a conflict are irrelevant, the only relevant considerations are future costs and benefits.

But McCain and others won't speak in terms of the known principles of defense economics because:

1) the defense contractor constituency is profiting wildly.

2) the energy sector is profitting wildly

3) the banking sector is profitting wildly from the overvalued petrodollar, which is subsidized by the rest of the world and extremely overvalued. The value of the petrodollar and its monopoly status as a world currency was threatened by Iraq and is threatened by Iran. What is going on now is a globalized version of the nazi Hjalmar Schacht's theory of economy, enforce the value of your currency by force.

4) Armed conflict arouses patriotism and group think knee jerk responses to alleged or manufactured security crises, this is how the energy-defense-banking class manipulates the public into doing what is wrong: conquest and colonialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Proponents of surge must state expected results and due date. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. exactly. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have no respect at all for McCain.
He is either totally insane or he is just trying to position himself for what he thinks is ultimate political advantage in the 2008 Presidential race. Someone who has actually experienced war should know better than to support the Chimperor's "plan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think DICK Cheney said it best: "Go fuck yourself"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Insane McCain
You know there might be some truth to those rumors Bush put out about him...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. He claims that a defeat in Iraq would be Catastrophic
for the United States.

The defeat has already happened, and (like a cat trying to cover up his dirty deed on a linoleum floor), no amount of effort to the contrary will change the fact that Bushco has created the FUBAR of all FUBARs.

They're willing to sacrifice the lives of more American troops so that they Can get out of office and blame the next guy for the failures.

REPREHENSIBLE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think that we will be able to come back from this defeat
They should just declare victory, like Trump says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC