I sent an email to a relative who is a now retired colonel (retired about 5 years ago) and was involved in operations in the Gulf War and knows a lot about combat training. He's a lifelong Republican. He supported this war in the 4 years ago and Bush. Here is what he said in relation to both Bush's proposed surge, our presence there and the news about the deployment of the Armys 4th Stryker brigade that is about to deploy without having completed its basic training at Ft. Irwin or Ft. Polk. (See the news here -
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/military/stryker/story/6320244p-5509832c.html )
(NOTE what my relative the retired Colonel says about the importance of the training and what is the destiny of those troops going into Bush's surge plan. Note also what the solution is going to be - not military - its going to take a civilian one - US and the Congress)
"Dear ____:
Great to hear from you; even considering the topic. YES, I agree with you completely. But forget surge; why are we still there, now, anyway, given the "civil war" situation. That was the one condition that was always drummed into us when I attended the Army's most senior leadership school (The Army War College); selection rate for this was something like 4.8% and toughest cut to make outside of General Officer .... anyway .... never get involved in a civil war was a recurrent theme while in training. You are right that Ft Irwin and the National Training Center is VERY important in deployment training. It is like the final exam and is how a unit determines it's readiness and what weaknesses it has; can't imagine skipping this critical step in the deployment process. One of the things that bothers me most about this surge idea is that these units are going to be "embedded" with the Iraqi's -- they are going to be "forted up" with them; go on patrol with them, be in direct support of them and essentially be under their Command and Control ... this certainly exposes them more and one would expect an increase in casualties. I don't have an answer on how we can get out. It will not come from the military as this would amount to mutiny and you really don't want the military deciding what is right for our country (Seven Days in May-wise). It must come from our civilian leadership. I see more and more republicans coming out against what we are doing every day and think that even the die hards will be pounding on the Presidents desk in the next 90 days when this surge thing goes south. You've been against this from the beginning and been a passionate vocal advocate of getting out quickly; I'd say about 3 more months and no one will be able to justify our continued presence there."