Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi is getting more and more delusional...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:22 PM
Original message
Condi is getting more and more delusional...
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1578010,00.html?xid=site-cnn-partner

If this is the best we can do for world diplomatic efforts, it is time to fold 'em.

<snip>

. She would not rule out the possibility that U.S. troops might cross the Iraq border into Iran in pursuit of Iranians suspected of moving weapons to Iraqi militias. But she said she trusts the expertise of Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who believes that the Iranian arms networks can be broken up with intelligence and interdiction inside Iraq.

—She recently questioned Chinese officials about their plan to invest $16 million to develop a natural gas field in Iran. "We've made clear the downsides of investing in Iran," she said. While the secretary hasn't asked China point blank to abandon the plan, she has let Chinese officials know that investing in Iran while it is under U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to stop its suspect nuclear activities is "a financial risk and . a reputational risk."

—North Korea may soon return to multilateral negotiations aimed at dismantling its nuclear weapons program in exchange for economic aid. Despite an inconclusive round of talks in December, with China "putting pressure on the North Koreans do to more," Rice said, "it's certainly the best alignment of forces for a possible solution that I've seen in a while."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Condi lectures China on "reputational risk"
"She recently questioned Chinese officials about their plan to invest $16 million to develop a natural gas field in Iran. "We've made clear the downsides of investing in Iran," she said. While the secretary hasn't asked China point blank to abandon the plan, she has let Chinese officials know that investing in Iran while it is under U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to stop its suspect nuclear activities is "a financial risk and . a reputational risk." (sic)

What the hell is that? And why would China listen to ANYTHING this WH says? I thank my lucky stars each night that China isn't openly exploiting our current weakened military state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. sound like a threat to me
as in "we might have to make an air strike against iran and it would be a damn shame if any chinese investment were to get caught in the middle of that sort of thing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Great minds.....nt
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 04:56 PM by caledesi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. B*sh, Condi, Blair
all seem to belong to some strange ideological cult but it's hard to pin down what exactly is at the heart their delusion.

At least with Hitler he wrote a book (Mein Kampf), gave his cult an unusual name - "The Nazis" - and made them wear special uniforms with a strange symbol on it so that we could tell they were the bad guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. And they say Clinton had a problem with semantics...
When is a "surge" not a surge?
When is an escalation not an escalation?
When the Secretary of Mistatement says it's an AUGMENTATION!
That's when.
Thank god they didn't let the Shrub try to pronounce that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC