Posted on Sun, Jan. 14, 2007
Administration leaving out important details on Iraq
By MARK SEIBEL
McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON - President Bush and his aides, explaining their reasons for sending more American troops to Iraq,
are offering an incomplete, oversimplified and possibly untrue version of events there that raises new questions about the accuracy of the administration's statements about Iraq. ....................
Beginning in 2002, the administration's case for a pre-emptive war in Iraq was plagued by similar
oversights, oversimplifications, misjudgments and misinformation. Unlike the administration's claims about the Samarra bombing, however, much of that information was peddled by Iraqi exiles and defectors and accepted by some eager officials and journalists.
..........................
Much like the administration's pre-war claims about Saddam's alleged ties to al-Qaida and purported nuclear weapons program, the claims about the bombing of the Shiite mosque in Samarra
ignore inconvenient facts and highlight questionable but politically useful assumptions. .................
The administration has continued to offer inaccurate information to Congress, the American people and sometimes to itself. The Iraq Study Group, in its December report, concluded, for example, that the U.S. military was systematically under-reporting the violence in Iraq in an effort to disguise policy failings. The group recommended that the military change its reporting system.
Much more BULLSHIT at:
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/16460924.htm?source=rss&channel=krwashington_nation