Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In the event that anyone here has any illusions about Joe Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:35 AM
Original message
In the event that anyone here has any illusions about Joe Lieberman
being an honest individual, perhaps you missed this little nugget from his MTP appearance:



"The president offered a proposal the other night that holds the hope of victory in a critical battle for the Iraqis and for us. With all respect, the other proposals represent the beginning of a retreat, of a defeat. And I think the consequences for the Middle East, which has been so important to our international stability over the years, and to the American people, who have been attacked on 9/11 by the same enemy that we’re fighting in Iraq today, supported by a rising Islamist radical super-powered government in Iran, the consequences for us, for—I want to be personal—for my children and grandchildren, I fear will be disastrous. That’s why I want to do everything I can to win in Iraq. And, and, and I think that’s what my, my oath of office requires me to do."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16577874/page/5/





Just to be clear, Holy Joe has advanced the idea that not only did Iraq attack us on 9/11, but Iran was also behind it. Even the most heinous Republicks have not make that leap yet. Thanks Joe, may you rot in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would love to see the dirt that the pugs have on Joe!
It must be really terrible to make him lie like that! Let me say that the pictures must really burn the eyes! He is a disease on this country! Peace, Kim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Joe's "tell" is his blinking when he's lying
He was blinking a lot during that appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. AIPAC tool Steny Whore leads the house, PNAC tool Shumer leads
the senate. We're screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. If the Dems reside over Iraqi escalation, or Iranian invasion, they've lost my support for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. We're of the same mind on that issue
While I won't abandon the party, I will only vote for PDA and DFL candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. totaly screwed.
we have no one left to save us from the Iraq quagmire and an escalation into Iran. Even Carl Levin is talking like a tool.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Something else I heard about Lieberman
Can't confirm it, but I heard that HE IS BLOCKING ANY SENATORIAL INVESTIGATIONS of the whole Katrina fiaasco. This is unacceptable, if true. In other words, the Dems really don't have a majority in the Senate with Lieberman being a Repub in independent's clothing.
Sorry about the caps, just trying to emphasize the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I heard that mentioned on Stephanie Miller this morning.
Unconscionable.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Quite true and duly confirmed. He wants to look forward
not conduct a witch hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. He's saving them from their impeachable emails to each other
People would be in the streets the next day if it were revealed what * and others were saying to each other during the 5 DAYS after Katrina that people were dying of thirst and heat exhaustion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Leiberman is as bad as Cheney, Perle, Rumsfeld or Wolfowitz.
Perhaps worse, because he is crammed into the wrong party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fucking Connecticut voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I voted for Ned.
Alot of us did.I believe something fishy may have gone on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. F'ing Repubs who funded LIEberman's campaign
and threw the Repub nominee under the bus then ran him over a couple of times.

F'ing State Dem leaders who didn't back Lamont - like James Ammann - may he rot in hell along with LIEbermand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Far worse in my book is the 30% Democrat vote he got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Actually the worst was that it was legal for him to run after losing a primary race...
Talk about usurping the democratic process...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't believe in limiting the people's power to choose their representatives...
... by making that illegal.

I blame the voters for exercising their right in a jackass way.

Certainly, opinions may differ on whether the voters' rights to choose their own representatives should be limited in that fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. When you run in a primary for your party, and lose, it should be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. (shrug) Ok. We just disagree on limiting the people's voting power by law. That's ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Agreed . But don't blame all of us
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It's obvious from the OP subject whom I'm talking about. No confusion is possible....
Except by those who are out *looking* to be offended. As you seek, so shall ye find, as they say - no phraseology on my end can prevent that. To hell with those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. I had the same reaction when Lieberman said those things.
I vainly hoped that someone would point out that even Junior has admitted Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, Iran was not nearly as hostile toward us until The Decider helped justify the sentiment with his threatening war rhetoric, and there was no al Qaeda presence there until neocons like Lieberman threw out the welcome mat for them. It's frustrating to see these same lies go unchallenged over and over in the presence of Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Joe does expect to be McCain's VP. which will gurantee a Democratic win...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yes they have ...
I have a friend that is head over heals republican. He has always believed that bush is the right man at the right time. Every day that goes by, he feels stronger about this.

His latest nonsense spew is that Europe is poised to fall to the IslamoFacists. He believes that our mission should be to wipe them off the face of the earth (i.e. all Muslims).

I can't discuss politics with this person. I didn't have the heart to tell him that there is no such thing as an IslamoFacist, and that this term was created purely to rile up hate for Muslims.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Mny people find comfort living in the dark ages
because its just simpler and requires no critical thinking, as long as they are told they are are good and the other guy is evil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SanCristobal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. Lets be fair, Lieberman is talking about Al Qaeda.
Remember Zarqawi and the Golden Mosque? Al Qaeda is a powerful force in Iraq, and to some degree we are fighting the people who attacked us on 9/11. That doesn't mean they were there when we invaded, just that we managed to create a chaotic place they could operate in. Lieberman accepts the ideological reason for the war (that democracy can wipe out radical Islamic terrorism) and it's no surprise that he is making this argument.

I hope the McCain Lieberman thing was some terrible, terrible joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Or is he stirring up the anti-Islamitic pot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC