But neocons are trying to get off the hook too. Maybe you have heard some of them claim that their PNAC vision of world conquest was brilliant all along, but we just got bogged down in Iraq due to the incompetence of their scapegoat du jour. They argue that we need only replace said scapegoat (Rummy comes quickly to mind) and then invade the next country on their list. I will not help them rationalize their way out of a necessary confrontation with reality.
If an individual wants to claim Bush and Cheney are not 'real' Republicans, and then continue worshiping their Saint Ronnie of Reagan, then they'll get no quarter from me in that respect. Reagan, Poppy, and Junior are quite a bit alike and Junior intentionally emulates Reagan's behavior of provocative war rhetoric and immense military buildup in favor of domestic programs. It was Reagan who created the Republican party atmosphere in which the neocons feel welcome to this day. Such is the matrix in which the current administration and their cronies were formed and it could incubate more of the same.
I agree that the Bush Junta is not made up of true conservatives but neither is the majority of the Republican party, IMO. Ike was an example of what I consider a true conservative, but this label does not apply to our last 3 Republican presidents. If people today want to support
true conservative values they will vote for Democrats, not Republicans.
On a national scale I don't think we should be conciliatory right away. It is important to promote awareness of what was done and by whom to get us into the Iraq nightmare. That is not being done effectively so far.
In his January 11 opening statement as Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Jay Rockefeller said, "I believe our actions in Iraq have placed our Nation more at risk to terrorist attack than before the invasion. Based on the findings of the Committee’s Iraq investigation, I have concluded that the Administration promoted non-existent links between Iraq and al-Qaeda in an effort to sell a war that was fundamentally about regime change, not about an imminent threat to America."
I think it's pretty profound for the Committee Chairman to have said that he's concluded the Administration lied us into the war in Iraq but this portion of his statement was not published in a single newspaper. I'm not in favor of rubbing somebody's nose in it once they have seen the light but I certainly don't think we need to drop this issue and move on.