Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smoking foes bring the fight to apartment buildings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 06:49 PM
Original message
Smoking foes bring the fight to apartment buildings
Smoking foes bring the fight to apartment buildings

By Sanjay Bhatt

Seattle Times staff reporter

A year after a statewide smoking ban took effect at workplaces, restaurants, bars and other public places, a new battlefield over secondhand smoke is emerging: apartment buildings.

Spurred on by nonsmoking tenants and public-health leaders, more private landlords are considering restricting smoking inside their rental units. And local public-housing agencies are also looking at banning smoking in the units of some buildings.

Since the ban took effect, people have gotten used to going out in the community and not being exposed to secondhand smoke, and that's prompted some to ask, "Why do I have to take it in my home?" says Roger Valdez, manager of the tobacco-prevention program for Public Health — Seattle & King County, which enforces the smoking ban here.

"We've been surprised by the increased level of interest to make their apartments smoke-free," he said.

A year ago last month, the voter-approved Initiative 901 took effect. It prohibits smoking in work settings and public places — from offices to bowling alleys — and within 25 feet of their front doors, or a "reasonable" distance, to keep smoke from wafting indoors.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003526616_smoking16m.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can the make these rules after the fact?
If they allowed a smoking tenant to move into the building, they shouldn't be allowed to ban smoking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They Can Change it if the Lease is Changed
Many apartment building require tenants to sign a new lease every year, and all kinds of things can be slipped into the new document. If not, the apartment may try to force the issue but legally may have to wait until the tenant moves out.

I would suspect there are a wide variety of attitudes among landlords. A heavy smoker can leave a place reeking for the next tenant, but it also chases away potential tenants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I see a business opportunity here
We can rent mobile homes to smokers in specially designated zones. Encase the whole park in a bubble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. I once lived in an apartment with walls so thin that I knew when my neighbor lit up
No kidding. I shared the airspace with my neighbors.

My now-grown daughter, who unfortunately is a well-addicted smoker, parses her smoking territories out pretty well. She doesn't smoke inside her rented house. She doesn't smoke in her car if her toddler is in it with her, but does if he is not. She certainly goes outdoors if she wants to light up when she visits me or any other nonsmoker.

I understand how landlords can restrict tenants if they want to -- the damage cigarette and cigar smoke does to everything is pretty bad, and you cannot get rid of the reek without repainting, recarpeting and getting new drapes. I've even checked out library books that smell strongly.

But I don't know about the increasing restrictions on a legal habit, I really don't.

What I would very much like to see is a shut-down on all advertising for cigarettes, which would enormously reduce the incidence of what the tobacco industry calls "replacement smokers".

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC