Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time: Libby Trial: Anti-Bush Jurors Excluded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:05 AM
Original message
Time: Libby Trial: Anti-Bush Jurors Excluded
Libby Trial: Anti-Bush Jurors Excluded

Tuesday, Jan. 16, 2007 By AP/MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN Article ToolsPrintEmail WASHINGTON -- Two potential jurors who expressed negative views of Bush administration officials were dismissed on the opening day of the perjury trial of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

The start of jury selection in the CIA leak case provided a potentially crucial victory for Libby's defense lawyers. They were allowed to ask potential jurors in detail about their opinions of the Bush administration, Vice President Dick Cheney, a group of high-profile reporters and whether the administration had lied to push the country into war with Iraq. The defense faces a key challenge in picking a jury for this highly political case in a city where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans more than 9-to-1. Cheney is expected to be a defense witness.

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald objected repeatedly, but to no avail, that Libby's lawyers were going beyond the more general opinion questions that U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton asked the entire jury pool when the proceedings began Tuesday morning.

Fitzgerald complained that defense attorneys Theodore Wells and William Jeffress were turning jury selection into "an open-ended Rorschach test into how you feel about the Bush administration, Vice President Cheney" the Iraq war and various reporters. "They're trying the case" in jury selection, he argued.

But Walton ruled the defense lawyers have a right to know if "somebody has a very negative attitude to the Bush administration."

more...
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1579421,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. With such a low approval rating, they'd be hard pressed to find 12 people in one rom who do like *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It'll be slow but hardly impossible.
I've read estimates jury selection will last until Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm sure, at some point, the trial will have to begin.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. How many challenges does each side get? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I found this in the article...
snip...

Six jurors were qualified to serve on the jury, which is expected to have 12 members and four alternates. Once the number of qualified jurors reaches 37, the judge will allow lawyers to exercise their peremptory strikes (12 for the defense and eight for the prosecution) to send jurors home. Walton said the trial should last four to six weeks.


it may take awhile to get to that first 37. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. !!!! 37 !!!! I doubt they'll find 12 !!!!
Well, ok, there are at least 37 misguided idiots on the planet. Now, what are the chances they'll finally all be herded into the same room?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. On the positive side, there will probably be twelve more people on the
planet who, after hearing all of the evidence, will not like AT ALL what the * administration has done/perpetrated.

They're about to get an 'edjamacation', as it were....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is gonna take forEVer.
Is this woman a DUer? If not, get her a login PRONTO:

"By comparison, one young woman swiftly sealed her own disposition by announcing right off the bat that she was 'completely without objectivity' and 'there is nothing they could say or do that would make me think anything positive about them.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. I guess they'll have to move the trial to San Francisco....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fitz needs to throw out anyone
who watches false news and listens to hate radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC