Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: GOP senator to join Democrats on anti-surge resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:15 AM
Original message
NY Times: GOP senator to join Democrats on anti-surge resolution
A GOP lawmaker at odds with the Bush administration over policy in Iraq will team with Democrats on upcoming legislation opposing the troop "surge," The New York Times will report tomorrow.

"Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, an outspoken Republican critic of the administration's Iraq policy, will join two leading Democrats in introducing a resolution opposing President Bush's buildup of troops in Iraq," write Carl Hulse and Jim Rutenberg for the Times, "putting a bipartisan stamp on the looming congressional showdown over the war."

The article reports that "Hagel had been consulting for the past few days" with the Democrats, Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) and Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), "to develop the wording of the resolution, which could be introduced as early as Wednesday."

more -

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/NY_Times_GOP_senator_to_join_0116.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Better hurry up! but great news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. The neocon neo-Nixonians think they've Goldwaterproofed themselves.
I'm not so sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. ..
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 01:17 PM by charles t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hagels's awright!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EdwardM Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is it too late to trade Chuck Hagel for Joe Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. On foreign affairs, it's pretty much the case anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. My thoughts exactly. Let Hagel chair a committee. Couldn't be any worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. It's a deal! You can have Lieberman. I'll gladly take Hagel.
and WELCOME TO DU!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hagel is an ardent right winger to the core. Don't get fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hagel appears to have a very extreme voting record. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's popular to be against the war now...
Hagel's looking at '08. As for his voting record he's as repuke as they come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gee, it's certainly no coincidence that he's running for President is it?
Hagel is this year's McCain. It's not that hard to do something that 80% of the country agrees with you on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hagel has been opposing the war for several years......
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 09:19 AM by charles t

Even in 2001, when he voted for the IWR, he stated told Bush he did so for the purpose of giving the president a "stick" to use to force a diplomatic solution. Hagel publicly lobbied the president against actually invading Iraq, even after he voted for the IWR. Since 2001, his actions have consistently suggested he realizes his mistake.

He is despised by the neocon/theocon/Limbaugh wing of the Republican Party, who are infuriated by his actions.

Even with overwhelming majorities of Americans opposed to escalation, the opinion of the GOP activists that dominate the precinct/county/state/national power structure and nominating process is precisely the opposite.

The right wing noise machine has been actively gunning for him to deprive him of re-nomination for the Senate in 2008. This movement to purge him from the GOP was going on even before his recent strongly worded public criticism of escalation.

The chances of Hagel receiving the GOP nomination, rounded to the closest .01%, perhaps approaches zero. His chances of GOP machine challenge to his Senate re-nomination is real.

Yet rather than moderate his rhetoric, Omaha television's Joe Jordan reports that Hagel insiders have leaked that Hagel will neither run for president nor re-election to the Senate in 2008, although Hagel has made no official announcement. http://leavenworthstreet.blogspot.com/2006/12/hagel-plans.html

Since the above leak, Hagel's criticism appears to be freed of any attempt to mollify the pro-war GOP activist base.

One might wonder if Hagel is laying the groundwork to break from the GOP, perhaps to become independent (an independent Senate candidacy might conceivably defeat a pro-war, party-blessed Republican in Nebraska), perhaps a third-party presidential candidacy, perhaps to endorse a Democrat against a pro-war Republican presidential candidate in 2008.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. EXCELLENT NEWS!
Hagel is mad as hell and it's good to see he's showing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. ROBERT SCHEER: "Hagel for PRESIDENT!" - - -WTF????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC