Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Soldier-- "Not more troops, but fewer Fobbit-motherf***ers"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
vogonity Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:44 AM
Original message
US Soldier-- "Not more troops, but fewer Fobbit-motherf***ers"
"That's not at all the way it works in Iraq. For one thing, the majority of the troops in a place like Baghdad never leave the massive, seemingly Manhattan-sized walled-in Forward Operating Bases (FOBs). Battle-hardened soldiers derisively describe army personnel who live in the FOBs as "Fobbits" and it is roundly accepted in Iraq that Fobbits make up a clear majority of our deployed military men. For soldiers who actually have to go out and risk getting blown up in patrols, Fobbits are a vile contagion, like malarial mosquitoes -- amazingly numerous and deeply annoying. One soldier laughed when I asked if he thought we needed more guys in Iraq. "Not more troops, but fewer Fobbit-motherfuckers," he growled."


From Matt Taibbi

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/46535/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Behind the Green Walls...
Lying by the pool, reading the Internet, drinking Pepsi Colas...they read about the IEDs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. "Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone"
I know this has been posted before, but you description warrants another posting...

Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone

by Rajiv Chandrasekaran

From The New Yorker
This revealing account of the postwar administration of Iraq, by a former Baghdad bureau chief for the Washington Post, focusses on life in the Green Zone, the American enclave in central Baghdad. There the Halliburton-run (and Muslim-staffed) cafeteria served pork at every meal—a cultural misstep typical of the Coalition Provisional Authority, which had sidelined old Arab hands in favor of Bush loyalists. Not only did many of them have no previous exposure to the Middle East; more than half had never before applied for a passport. While Baghdad burned, American officials revamped the Iraqi tax code and mounted an anti-smoking campaign. Chandrasekaran's portrait of blinkered idealism is evenhanded, chronicling the disillusionment of conservatives who were sent to a war zone without the resources to achieve lasting change.
Copyright © 2006 Click here to subscribe to The New Yorker

From Booklist
It is now more than three years since American and so-called coalition forces launched the invasion of Iraq. Despite the immediate military success, the U.S. remains mired in the swamp--afraid of the consequnces of leaving yet unable to shape an acceptable reality while staying. Given the fissures in Iraqi society that our intervention revealed, perhaps the current state of violent chaos was inevitable. However, Chandrasekaran, an assistant managing editor of the Washington Post and the former Post bureau chief in Baghdad, maintains that shocking American arrogance and blundering during the first year of the American occupation virtually destroyed any hope of a "successful" occupation. The Green Zone was the headquarters for the American occupation in Baghdad, but like the inhabitants of the Emerald City of Oz, the Americans entrusted with the task of rebuilding and transforming Iraq lived in an isolated fantasy world divorced from the reality outside their walled compounds. This is perhaps a one-sided account, but it is still a devastating indictment of the post-invasion failures of the Bush administration. Jay Freeman

“In Imperial Life in the Emerald City draws a vividly detailed portrait of the Green Zone and the Coalition Provisional Authority (which ran Iraq’s government from April 2003 to June 2004) that becomes a metaphor for the administration’s larger failings in Iraq . . . His book gives the reader a visceral–sometimes sickening–picture of how the administration and its handpicked crew bungled the first year in postwar Iraq, showing how decisions made in that period contributed to a burgeoning insurgency and growing ethnic and religious strife . . . The picture Mr. Chandrasekaran draws in these pages often reads like something out of Catch-22 or from MASH.”
- Michiko Kakutani, The New York Times


“Extraordinary . . . Indispensable . . . Full of jaw-dropping tales of the myriad large and small ways in which Bremer and his team poured fuel into the lethal cauldron that is today’s Iraq . . . has a keen eye for the small detail that illuminates larger truths . . . documents the way that an avalanche of unjustifiable mistakes transforms a difficult mission into an impossible one . . . Chandrasekaran does not set out to score partisan points or unveil large geopolitical lessons; he is, essentially, a reporter telling readers what he saw. Yet it is impossible to read his book without thinking about the larger implications of the story he tells.”
-Moisés Naím, The Washington Post Book World


--more--
Amazon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. And it's the Fobbits, the behind-the-wire types, the "In the rear with the gear" tools, who are the
first to pipe up about their exploits. If they are talking to someone who doesn't realize what their job assignment is, and who thinks that anyone wearing a cammy uniform is out on the front lines, they're the first to portray themselves as Rambo-esque creatures. Always handy with a war story, when the reality is closer to the terrible time when they couldn't type up the Plan of the Day OR the Duty Watchbill when the power went out and the generators were out of fuel! And oh, the HUMANITY! Having to live without air conditioning until the Public Works types fixed the problem was damned near unbearable....and let's not even talk about the time the mess hall ran out of ranch dressing...it's just too painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. In Vietnam, they were called REMFs
stood for Rear Echelon Mother Fuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4bucksagallon Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I call them rear echelon shit burners but the name in the corp was pogie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. RAMF...Rear Area Mother Fuckers in the Corps.. nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Been known by that for years before Vietnam
I read "Citizen Soldiers" by Stephen Ambrose, and he talked to a lot of men who had been in combat across Europe. One guy talked about living in his fox hole for days on end, developing a lifelong habit of cupping his hand over the end of his cigarette because the cherry would draw fire if it was seen. For that guy, everyone behind his fox hole was defined as "rear echelon."

The book is by turns harrowing, sad, depressing, and even funny. But it also points up the difference between wars fought for a military objective, and wars fought over ideological supremacy (which is not to say that there weren't political differences as well in World War II, but the bulk of the fighting was conquest and liberation of conquered territory). There aren't any military objectives in Iraq. We can "take" any piece of ground we want to, and hold it for as long as it suits us. But simply holding this city or dominating that province doesn't bring us any nearer an identifiable military objective, certainly not like establishing a beachhead on D-Day or winning the Battle of the Bulge did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. OT, but may be of interest to you...
I do indeed like that particular book. Might I suggest also his book "Eisenhower and His Boys" and my favorite of the WWII oral history genre, Studs Terkel's, 'The Good War'.

The Good War goes beyond interviewing only the Allies and into in-depth interviews with Germans and a few Soviet soldiers.


Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just one little problem
Where do you think the field hospitals are located? In FOB's!

So let's yank all of the Fobbits out, and the next time a troop has his leg blown off by an IED, maybe his buddies can reattach it with staples and duct tape!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. you still your duct tape from 2001, no?
when our homeless scrutiny assholes told us we needed it to protect our homes?

Well, be a patriot and donate it to Iraqnam, already.

sheesh.

I wonder how long before some faux channel idiot begins a MASH II made for TV show about Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. If they call these alleged brothers in arms "Fobbits"...
...imagine what they think of us civilians, sitting comfortably at home, who never even see Iraq except in carefully-scrubbed TV images. When this war is over, there will be plenty of healing to do, everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fuggin' REMFs
...in the rear with the gear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. When it gets to this kind of infighting & name calling it's time to call
the whole thing off. Because it's going no place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red1 Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Crazy
you have to have the proper support for the soldiers, the problem I have are with all the war hawks that talk as though they were combatants, while in the vicinity of another american "war",

red1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC