|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:45 PM Original message |
Gonzales claims the constitution does not guarantee the right of Habeas Corpus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. WTF??? This is as absurd as the Pubs saying it doesnt give you freedom of religeon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Gonzales is claiming it's not in the constitution. Make the Repukes back him up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
46. Habeas Corpus ought to be on the Dem 08 platform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Don't think we can wait that long. Need legislation NOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. That's an excellent example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. But that's based on natural rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I use these amendments as the basis of my logic: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Or Better Yet, The RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. And how he defends it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. Gonzo talks out his a$$ all the time. God help us and save us from these thugs and bullies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. That's because they want to be cafeteria constitutionalists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. Is this being streamed by CSPAN? I can't find it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. Gonzales shows how frigging ignorant he is every time he opens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Oh he's not ignorant, he knows better. He's just way too willing to be a tool for the criminals in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. NO, NO, NO. You misunderstand. He shows his ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Gotcha completely. I just like highlighting that despite his dazzling formal education, he has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. Art 1 Sec 9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. I nominate you for the post of US Attorney General, seems you are overqualified for the job 'tho. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Well he's right, but it shows that he has a profound lack of understanding of our basic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
45. You're wrong. He understands it perfectly. He and the other fascists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
36. And there is no suggestion in the text that it applies only to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Crimeny, has that twit even READ the US Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Why would he bother reading it? He thinks it's "quaint." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. He's hung his case on that "techinquely not guaranteed" notion you recognize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Yoo - egads, what a monster. Must have been born of a jackal. -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rock
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Remember: Habeas Corpus = Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. It took me about 8 seconds to find it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. Way past time for the Congress to impeach this piece of .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosferaustin
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. just say it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
solara
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. Gonzalez is "catapultin' the propaganda" like the good little toady he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
19. Take away this asshole's law license. He isn't fit to practice law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. Time for Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. Can't wait to see this as the headline on CNN, MSNBC, and FAUX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
25. I feel KO gettin' his anger up because of this idiot general - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
26. same idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raiden
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
28. This is not a War on Terror...This is a War on the Constitution!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
31. Isn't incompetence enough to remove him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. This is not just incompetance.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. I hope Congress learns a lesson from this. NEVER give a president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
32. Here is the statement by Gonzales. Send it to every news media that you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Can you post the link to those quotes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. It was during the Judicial Committee hearing today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Sorry, have to find it again. It's on DU somewhere else as well. I'll find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Not on CSPAN any more. What's going on? Usually the feed is available |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jean
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
34. did this guy get his law degree by mail or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
35. Not a bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
44. Absolutely not. It's not time to debate the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC