Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does the Bar Association have the authority to disbarr a sitting US AG?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:11 PM
Original message
Does the Bar Association have the authority to disbarr a sitting US AG?
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 04:40 PM by rpgamerd00d
Please tell me they do....

The State Bar where he is registered should be told (emailed, faxed, called) that the sitting AG of the USA thinks no rights exist in the Constitution unless they are expressly written there.

Certainly, that qualifies this boob for disbarment!

Update:

Lets all write/fax/call and demand Alberto Gonzales disbarrment!!!


Texas State Bar Association

The offices of the Texas State Bar Association are located at:

1414 Colorado St.
Austin, TX 78701

Toll Free Phone: (800)204-2222
Local: (512)463-1463
Fax: (512)463-1475





The District of Columbia Bar
1250 H Street NW, Sixth Floor
Washington DC 20005-5937

Phone: 202-737-4700; 1-877-333-2227 (Toll Free)
Fax: 202-626-3471

Member Service Center
Phone: 202-626-3475; 1-877-333-2227, ext. 475 (Toll Free)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good question...
If so I hope someone has the courage to start the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't Bill Clinton was disbarred? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citygal Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, by Arkansas for five years for the Lewinsky thing.
Because he lied under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citygal Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think so.
You usually get disbarred for things related to dishonesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeeBee Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Right, so the AG should be disbarred right away. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Will Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. self-delete
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 04:23 PM by I_Will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oooh! Good point!
I'm not positive, but I think the answer to that would be yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. It would have to be the bar(s) of the state(s) that admitted Gonzalez.
The state giveth and the state can take away . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. In Pennsylvania, it is the PA Supreme Court which licenses attorneys.
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 04:41 PM by Divernan
One has to pass the "bar exam", and take continuing legal exam - but those are not administered or controlled by the state bar association. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has control of licensing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MousePlayingDaffodil Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. If by that you mean the American Bar Association . . .
. . . the answer is no. The ABA doesn't license lawyers. As far as I'm aware, the only organization(s) that could disbar Gonzalez would be the specific state bar(s) where he is licensed to practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Seems he passed the Bar in Texas. We need to call them.
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 04:26 PM by rpgamerd00d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. by definition, the Attorney General
must be admitted to the DC Bar, which is not great shakes, since there is reciprocity with every other state. However, Gonzales is probably a member of the Texas bar as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Here's his profile at the website of the State Bar Of Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. right, but the position of Attorney General
requires DC Bar admission. you can be a member of several state bars. but for this job, you need DC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I didn't say it didn't
Your post suggested he might be a member of the Texas bar, which I confirmed. And D.C. bar membership is an automatic for Gonzales, as it only requires membership in good standing in another State Bar for 5 years, no examination required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. He pratised law in Texas according to Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales

"Gonzales was an attorney in private practice from 1982 until 1994 with the Houston law firm Vinson and Elkins, where he became a partner. In 1994, he was named general counsel to then-Texas Governor George W. Bush, rising to become Texas Secretary of State in 1997 and finally to be named to the Texas Supreme Court in 1999, both appointments made by Governor Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hmmm. So what would be the next step??
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 04:30 PM by Janice325
Any Texan lawyers out there, or residents in Texas who might be able to check that out???
That's a great question, rpgamerd00d.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I put links to both Bars up top - we need to write/call
Get his ass disbarred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throwing Stones Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nice idea, but I don't think it would make a difference
As crazy as it sounds, there's no constitutional requirement that the AG be a licensed attorney. Of course, his appointment is confirmed by the Senate, but once there ... Also, an offense that would give rise to disbarment would also be a "high crime or misdemeanor", so why not just impeach the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. On what grounds?
Seriously, what does his opinion on the Constitution have to do with being disbarred?

I'm an attorney. You are not required to believe anything. I personally don't believe that the 2nd Amendment necessarily guarantees the individual right to gun ownership.

I know of attorneys who file motions claiming that the 14th Amendment is invalid. They are allowed.

Attorneys can basically argue any crazy-ass thing they want as long as they are ethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19.  Lying on the stand.
He was under oath.
He lied.

Done deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. He didn't lie if he believes that opinion to be true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ha,ha. ha,ha, and,oh,ha.
So sad that the only time you can get the Bar Association to get off its ass and regulate its own, is when there's tremendous political pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yes, but it depends on where he is admitted.
Every bar has its own rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Isn't there something about "Conflict of interest"?
Either he is The People's Attorney...which I understand is his putative job description...
Or he is White House fixer counsel, which is what he has actually been doing.

He's not supposed to be wearing both those hats at the same time, is he?
That's conflict of interest...can he be gotten on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC