|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:45 PM Original message |
If we're going to have to have a line-item veto... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. We aren't going to have a line item veto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Right. It's the poison pill to kill legislation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. What I'm afraid of is that SCOTUS will NOW rule it's OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evlbstrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. It's extemely unusual for the SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Phew -- I feel better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. On some issues Scalia is actually a libertarian... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. it's like smacking a hornet's nest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm glad to know this is not a done deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why do they need it, anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. It was already struck down as Unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's a no-brainer.. SCOTUS already said so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. BINGO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-18-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. At the very earliest, as it would require amending the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC