|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:22 PM Original message |
Ex-Rice speechwriter tells paper she doesn't have the 'vaguest notion' of Middle East history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. After all, they named an oil tanker after her and not a library at a college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. Really? You don't say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. exactly, if we knew US history, we wouldn't be standing for what is going on today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. These days, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Just as... drum roll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. And 1960s China... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #13 |
29. 1950's USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
28. They can't swift-boat everyone. We can all stand up and say "stop it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I know some of those folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. according to our Attorney General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Tep but here is the critical question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 07:51 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. That is the difference between our side and their side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. That doesn't damn just Rice - it's everybody on top there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Newjeff wins the kewpie doll! DING DING DING! Absolutely right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. It is from the Wall Street Journal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. but you assume they read, and we are beginning to know better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. So glad he cleared that up for us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm glad this goes to the Greatest page now! We have to start focusing on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapere aude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. They are not concerned with history or anything else. It is a ruse to cover their lust for oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Exactly. These WWII comments are for 2 reasons: to pander to American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. Senior administration officials are eaten up in their zealous RW ideology and don't ned to know/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clinton_Co_Regulator (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. ConDUHleesa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
20. Well duh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bozita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
21. That's frontpage material, kpete! ... Good post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
22. "History is on the administration's side"? BULLSHIT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skypilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
23. From the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratefultobelib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-19-07 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. Oh, baloney, baloney, baloney! She uses a mouthful of pretty words, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 08:00 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I find I can't listen to any of them any more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC