Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wolfie says Dems 100-Hour Plan Was a Stunt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:25 PM
Original message
Wolfie says Dems 100-Hour Plan Was a Stunt
Gawd I cannot stand that man.:argh: - OP's comment



from MediaMatters:


Disputed even by a Republican, Blitzer persisted in suggesting that Dems' "100 Hours" agenda was a "stunt"
On the January 18 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer persisted in suggesting that the Democratic "100 Hours" legislative agenda was "merely a stunt," even after former Rep. J.C. Watts (R-OK), CNN's conservative voice in its "Strategy Session" debates, had previously told Blitzer: "I don't think it's a publicity stunt." Blitzer asked CNN congressional correspondent Andrea Koppel if the then-expected passage of all the items on the agenda was "a success" or "merely a stunt." While discussing the first bill in the 100 Hours agenda on January 9, Koppel asserted that there was "a political calculation involved in the timing of all of this." But on January 18, when Blitzer again suggested the agenda was a "stunt," Koppel replied that it was not, saying "it was definitely a success." On-screen graphics throughout Koppel's report and afterward continued to ask: "100 Hours: Success or Stunt?"



Twenty minutes later, Blitzer, Watts, and CNN political analyst and Democratic strategist Paul Begala again discussed the 100 Hours agenda. Although they did not suggest the agenda was a stunt during that exchange, on-screen graphics still asked: "Success or Stunt?"



As Media Matters for America noted, Blitzer told Watts on the January 9 edition of The Situation Room that " lot of critics are saying it's a pure publicity stunt." Watts disagreed: "I don't think it's a publicity stunt. I think there is substantive policy in what they're talking about doing." Despite Watts' answer in the 4 p.m. ET hour, Blitzer again asked of the 100 Hours agenda in the 7 p.m. hour: "s it a serious call to action or a political stunt?"

From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the January 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: You used to serve in the House of Representatives. Let's get to this first 100 Hours on their legislative calendar. The Democrats are saying, you know what? These six items they want to pass, they're all important, including raising the federal minimum wage.

A lot of critics are saying it's a pure publicity stunt.

What do you think?

WATTS: Wolf, I don't think it's a publicity stunt. I think there is some substantive policy in what they're talking about doing.

I think they made -- if I would have been advising them -- and I said this a week ago -- I would have advised them to not shove it down the throat of Republicans, allow them to have a say in debating this, going through committees and all those things, simply because I think there is some substantive policy there that needs to be debated. ....(more)
http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190008


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Umm so what if it was a publicity stunt?
That's what politics has turned into in this country, thanks to CNN, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Results matter, Wolfie, whether you like it or not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wolf has his nose so far up Bush's butt he knows what was for dinner last night.
What a jerk.

I do enjoy seeing Jack Cafferty smack him down from time to time, with comments from viewers that totally disagree with the cr@p Wolf is dishing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. How can it be a "stunt' if they passed 6 pieces of previously ignored legislation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wolfie's the Al Michaels of political commentary...
His best years are behind him, but he's kept around for nostalgia's sake.

Six pieces of legislation in 42 hours...That's more than the last session could accomplish in 42 WEEKS. Put that in your gnome pipe and smoke it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Btw, his name is "Lesley". The name "Wolf" is a stunt. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Healthcare, ethics, the war, minimum wage. Yep just stunts.
What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. So was the GOP "Contract On America"- BFD
it's called politics - funny how it works...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. So was this. Difference is, the Dems really did accomplish something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. stunt this wolf
If that was a stunt, then I want a million of them............


They have done more in 100hours then the Republicans did in 12years............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. What would Volfie say that NOT one item of the republicans
Contract with America was ever accomplished...NOT one...still waiting for term-limits the republicans were so concerned with when the Dem's controlled the house for 40 years....not a word after they took it over..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Three words:
"Contract With America"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. LOL. I thought you were gonna say...
Go f*ck yourself. :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. ROFL
That is what I thought too!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. They did more "for the people" in 100 hours than the pukes did in 12 years
Enough said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wolfie has shit for a brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. wolfie is a spokes model for the republick party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC