|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
cloud75
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:48 PM Original message |
Hillary will win because of debates...Hillary will win because she is a great debater. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aceman2373
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. yup, she is a master debater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. My, but aren't you the cunning linguist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hmmm, if I recall Kerry wiped the stage with georgie-boy all three debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. And chimp was getting help through an earpiece. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. sad, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SanCristobal
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
29. I disagree about the debate results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. I look forward to the debates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. And, that's going to be a problem ... picking just ONE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Isn't that effin brilliant?!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. Uh-huh. She is such an excellent speaker.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. McCain stinks as a debater. Even W beat him soundly in 2000 primary debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Obama , Hillary and Edwards in a three way debate would be a delight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Winning debates does not guarantee moving into the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Perot was certainly right about NAFTA. He lost support when he exited, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
21. winning a majority of the votes doesn't either, aparently... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Not so much. First of all, the primary "debates" are a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Yeah, I Agree. What Are We Gonna Have? 21 People In A Debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 03:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
38. This stuff is going to involve the entire staff of Saturday Night Live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
14. Off limits? Republicans would swiftboat their grandmothers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I am wondering how well that swiftboating business will work on her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
17. Debates, schmebates. Amy P. on SNL tonight had HRC dead-on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It would be a big mistake to put Hillary forward as the Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:54 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Tonight's SNL open nailed HRC. I'm surprised there's no dedicated thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
22. Who has she ever debated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:00 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Good point! She never had a tough Senate race in either of her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:15 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Where do people get there ideas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Yeah that Ric Lazio is a real force to be reckoned with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:35 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. which has nothing to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:48 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. The Lazio debate provides an example of what the OP is talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:52 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
25. Hillary would be Pillaried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:05 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. pilloried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 03:41 AM Response to Reply #27 |
39. I want a new word; "Hillaried!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
28. "issues based election" - when was the last time we had such a thing in this country? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. 1860 was a good year for substantive debates on issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:38 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. LOL, it may well have been that long ago, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Jan-21-07 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
32. Hillary will win? - I believe Hillary will cause Obama & Edwards to simply tweek!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC